Explainer

When AI use is disputed, whose word counts for a publisher?

AI-generated text and synthetic voice. How this text is made

Accusations came in late September. Orélien denied using AI, and on 14 October he denied it again. A week before the break, the publisher backed him. On 21 October, it ended the relationship.

Word against the record
  1. 14 OctoberAuthor denies AI use again
  2. 21 OctoberPublisher ends contract

He concedes using AI for research and translation, but insists the writing is his own. I had explained everything to people close to me, but right now I don't think my word is worth anything.

“I had explained everything to people close to me, but right now I don't think my word is worth anything.”

Thélyson Orélien

The publisher's commissioned analysis, reported this week, found AI tags in some working files. Analyses carried out with the Pangram detector gave 100% probability of computer-generated text, a detector score, not proof of authorship.

100%

Pangram probability of computer-generated textSource: ABC TU DIARIO EN ESPAÑOL · 22.10.2026

The publisher admits it will probably never have a definitive answer. Its statement says: The fundamental question for us is trust between authors and publishers.

“The fundamental question for us is trust between authors and publishers.”

Les Éditions du Boréal

Watch the explainer

Synthetic voice (AI)

The story

Éditions du Boréal ends ties with Thélyson Orélien after finding AI use in his novelRead the article

Based on reports by

List of sources