Government · London

UK lawmakers urge Defence Ministry to ban real bearskin caps for Royal Guards

A cross-party group of 18 MPs and a House of Lords peer have called on Defence Minister Luke Pollard to replace Canadian black bear fur with synthetic materials in King's Guard ceremonial headwear.

AI text based on reports by Fanpage, Il Messaggero, ANSA.it and other publishers. Published . How it is made

For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).

In brief

London · United Kingdom
How it came to this
  1. 2024British military orders 22 bearskin caps, according to PETA data
  2. 2025British military orders 96 bearskin caps
  3. September 2026Cross-party lawmakers send a letter to Defence Minister Luke Pollard requesting synthetic alternatives

Cross-party push for synthetic alternatives

A group of 18 Members of Parliament and one member of the House of Lords submitted a formal letter to Defence Minister Luke Pollard, requesting an end to the use of real bear fur for the King's Guard ceremonial uniforms. The cross-party signatories, comprising representatives from the Labour Party, the Liberal Democrats, and the Green Party, argued that continuing the centuries-old tradition is impossible to justify under contemporary animal welfare standards. The distinctive tall black caps are an internationally recognized symbol of Buckingham Palace and are worn by soldiers across the five Foot Guards regiments: the Grenadier, Coldstream, Scots, Irish, and Welsh Guards. The lawmakers asked the Ministry of Defence to suspend all pending orders for new pelts while collaborating directly with textile manufacturers to create synthetic substitutes.

Hunting practices and procurement numbers

The pelts used to produce the 45-centimetre-tall headgear are imported from legal black bear culls in Canada. Animal rights organization PETA UK, which campaigned alongside the lawmakers, released undercover video investigations documenting the methods employed by Canadian hunters. The footage showed hunters placing sweet food baits to attract bears before shooting them with firearms and crossbows. Campaigners emphasized that preparing a single ceremonial cap requires the pelt of at least one bear, leaving dependent cubs orphaned in the wild after hunting expeditions.

“The Ministry of Defence must urgently dedicate its resources to finding a faux fur and end the UK's support for the slaughter of wildlife overseas.”

PETA

Spending records and uniform longevity

Procurement data released under freedom of information legislation shows that the Ministry of Defence purchased 526 bearskin caps between 2017 and 2024, resulting in expenditures of more than $1.3 million. A single bearskin cap carries a unit cost of approximately £2,460 (around €2,800). Annual procurement totals showed sharp variations, with official records noting that 22 caps were purchased in 2024 before demand increased to 96 caps ordered in 2025.

Bearskin caps ordered by UK Ministry of Defence by yearcaps
2024
22 caps
2025
96 caps

Data from the article text

The ceremonial headpieces date back to the early 19th century, when armies introduced tall wicker structures covered in fur to make frontline infantry appear taller and more imposing during battle. In modern ceremonial service, soldiers maintain their issued caps with regular steaming, vigorous brushing, and specialized shampoos, enabling a single well-maintained bearskin to remain in continuous rotation for more than 40 years.

Testing standards and government trials

In response to the parliamentary letter, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence stated that the armed forces support transitioning to synthetic materials if an alternative meets strict military specifications. The department explained that any potential synthetic fur must pass five rigorous laboratory and field trials, evaluating water penetration, water resistance, aesthetic quality, drying speed, and durability. Previous assessment rounds conducted under the former Conservative government examined several artificial fabrics but concluded that none met the operational standards needed to withstand heavy British rainfall during outdoor palace duty.

Ask about this text

Sources and context

Places
London

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar