Transport · Urda, Adamuz, and Madrid
Spanish columnists debate human error and political blame after Urda rail crash
Spanish commentators are asking who answers for the Urda accident, which eldiario.es puts at 69 dead, and for the Adamuz crash that preceded it. Opinion pieces in four outlets focus on human error, the LZB signalling system and political accountability.
AI text based on reports by EL MUNDO, eldiario.es, ABC TU DIARIO EN ESPAÑOL and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
El Mundo counts 115 deaths across Adamuz and Urda in ten months, while eldiario.es gives 69 dead for Urda alone.
According to minister Óscar Puente, the LZB system recorded 170 loss-of-transmission incidents this year, which he called normal and attributed in three quarters of cases to causes outside the system.
Sánchez said confidence in the rail system is broken and called the situation inasumible, while eldiario.es urges Puente to step aside after three years in the post.
The CGPJ approved support for the judge in Orgaz, including two magistrates from the Toledo court of first instance, a step the ABC editorial questions as to its effectiveness.
Accidents, commentary and the death toll
Spanish opinion pages published on 1 November focus on who should answer for the Urda rail accident, which eldiario.es puts at 69 dead. Commentary in El Mundo, eldiario.es, ABC and El Periódico links Urda to the earlier Adamuz accident, and El Mundo counts 115 deaths across both in ten months. Several columnists place the two crashes within a wider run of crises in Spain, which El Mundo lists as the pandemic, the DANA episode, the blackout, Adamuz, Ceuta and Urda.
El Mundo argues that complex systems tend to produce accidents, which it calls normal in the sense that they are expected rather than inexplicable. It cites minister Óscar Puente saying the accidents were not inexplicable, implausible or of very low probability. The column names recurring weak points: failing systems, ignored warnings, fragmented information, broken chains of command and human errors that feed into technical faults. It says warnings from train drivers were ignored at Adif.
- EU collisions and derailments, last decade
- 209 deaths
- Adamuz and Urda, ten months
- 115 deaths
Data from the article text
Human error and the signalling system
eldiario.es argues that Urda was a human error, since machines do not err on their own. Its columnist traces a chain running from the controller who gave the wrong orders, to superiors, to those who designed and maintained the safety system, and up to governments of current and earlier administrations. The same piece reaches back to the high-speed rail model set up about forty years ago under the González government, arguing that it displaced a broader rail plan.
ABC's César Franco Ramos focuses on the LZB system, which supervises the Madrid to Seville high-speed line. According to Puente, the system recorded 170 loss-of-transmission incidents this year, which he called normal and attributed in three quarters of cases to causes outside the system. The columnist notes that it is unknown how many of those incidents forced trains to run in degraded conditions. At Urda, the loss of transmission automatically stopped several trains.
Political responsibility
Sánchez has said confidence in the rail system is broken, and El Mundo quotes him calling the situation inasumible. The eldiario.es columnist argues that Puente, who has run the ministry for three years, carries responsibility and is poorly placed to restore that trust. The piece calls on the president to take responsibility, saying a resignation would not be meaningless even one month before general elections.
El Mundo holds Puente and Adif's management team responsible for the accidents and criticises the president for keeping Puente in office. El Periódico separates criminal, administrative and political responsibility, arguing that political accountability begins when citizens' trust breaks. ABC's Ignacio Camacho argues that the second fatal accident broke the last thread of credibility the government had. None of the sources reports a resignation.
Judicial response
The ABC editorial asks whether the judicial response matches the scale of Urda. It says even big-city courts would struggle with accidents of this size, and that adding resources is harder in small towns with limited criminal caseloads. The General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) has approved support for the judge in Orgaz, the only competent judge for the investigation: a magistrate coordinator from Alcázar de San Juan, whose role is still to be defined, and two magistrates from the Toledo court of first instance, described as experts in emergencies and catastrophes.
The editorial doubts the measures' effectiveness and legal basis, saying they look like auditors placed beside the judge, since criminal responsibility rests exclusively with her. It notes that the 'ley Bolaños' provides for two judges to join the initial investigator in complex cases, an option the CGPJ did not take. It also says the evidence is spread between Madrid and Urda.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- EL MUNDONormal accidents, abnormal failuresAccidentes normales, fallos anormales · original in Spanish
- EL MUNDOLife has many readingsLa vida tiene muchas lecturas · original in Spanish
- eldiario.esHigh speed as a (human) errorLa alta velocidad como error (humano) · original in Spanish
- eldiario.esIt is your job, presidentEs su trabajo, presidente · original in Spanish
- Óscar Puente
- Spanish minister of transport whose ministry and Adif management are criticised over the accidents
- Pedro Sánchez
- Spanish prime minister who said confidence in the rail system is broken and called the situation inasumible
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar