Government · Hong Kong and Beijing
Hong Kong court sentences three Tiananmen vigil leaders to up to seven years
A Hong Kong court sentenced Lee Cheuk-yan, Chow Hang-tung, and Albert Ho to prison terms between five and seven-plus years for inciting subversion under the National Security Law.
AI text based on reports by europa press, Adnkronos, RFI and other publishers. Changed . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
Chow Hang-tung received seven years and three months, Lee Cheuk-yan received seven years, and Albert Ho was sentenced to five years and two months on 11 September 2026.
The court imposed a fine of HK$1.5 million ($191,304) on the now-disbanded Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China.
Judges ruled that the group's long-standing demand to end one-party dictatorship violated Article 1 of the Chinese constitution, despite the lack of physical violence.
The alliance had organized yearly Victoria Park commemorations since 1989, drawing approximately 180,000 attendees in 2019 before the 2020 security law took effect.
- 2021Hong Kong police detain and indict alliance leaders on national security charges.
- August 2026High court finds Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung guilty of inciting subversion.
- 11 SeptJudges sentence the three activists to between five and seven-plus years in prison.
Prison sentences and court rulings
A Hong Kong court sentenced three leading pro-democracy activists on 11 September 2026 to prison terms between five and seven-plus years for inciting subversion under the Beijing-imposed National Security Law. Chow Hang-tung, 41, received a sentence of seven years and three months, while Lee Cheuk-yan, 69, received seven years. Both had pleaded not guilty before their conviction in August 2026. Albert Ho, 74, who entered a guilty plea in January 2026, received a reduced sentence of five years and two months. The judges also ordered their disbanded organization, the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, to pay a fine of HK$1.5 million ($191,304). All three figures faced up to ten years in prison and have remained in custody since their indictment in 2021.
Constitutional arguments and judicial reasoning
The prosecution centered on the group's long-standing political campaigns, specifically their prominent slogan calling to end one-party dictatorship. Prosecutors argued that challenging Communist Party rule directly violated Article 1 of the Chinese constitution. The court rejected defence submissions that the activists genuinely believed they acted within legitimate free-speech protections recognized in the territory. While judges noted that the defendants used no physical violence and presented no operational timetable for political change, they ruled that the conduct carried considerable gravity because it unfolded during a period of widespread civic unrest. Both Lee and Chow indicated through their legal teams and supporters that they intend to appeal the verdicts.
Suppression of annual commemorations
The Hong Kong Alliance formed in May 1989 to support student-led pro-democracy demonstrations in Beijing before the military crackdown on 4 June 1989. For three decades, the organization held an annual candlelit vigil in Victoria Park, drawing tens of thousands of participants and reaching approximately 180,000 attendees in 2019. The gatherings served as the only large-scale public commemorations of the Tiananmen events permitted on Chinese soil alongside Macau. Following the enactment of the National Security Law in 2020, authorities effectively banned the gatherings and initiated prosecutions against the organizers. Prior to sentencing, Chow declared that the legal proceedings represented an attempt to erase public memory of 4 June by criminalizing peaceful political expression.
Domestic and international reactions
The rulings drew swift responses from government officials, human rights groups, and family members present at the courthouse. National Security Police chief Steve Li stated that the sentences provide a severe warning to anyone considering similar actions. Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee also defended the judicial outcome in an official statement.
“The law will never permit the use of human rights, democracy and freedom as a pretext to openly harm one's own country and compatriots.”
International organizations and foreign diplomats criticized the trial and the resulting penalties. Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch, condemned the High Court decision.
“By severely punishing the activists for conducting ordinary democratic activities, the Hong Kong High Court has violated their rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.”
Outside the courtroom, Lee's wife Elizabeth Tang stated that her husband spending three more years in detention was unacceptable, while Chow's mother urged supporters gathered outside to remain resolute.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- europa pressCondenados a cárcel tres activistas por organizar actos en Hong Kong...
- AdnkronosКитай, в Гонконге приговоры от 5 до 7 лет активистам площади Тяньаньмэнь
- AdnkronosChina, Hong Kong sentences Tiananmen Square activists to 5 to 7 years
- RFIHong Kong: trois militants de la mémoire de Tiananmen condamnés à des peines de cinq et sept ans de prison
- Lee Cheuk-yan
- Former chairman of the Hong Kong Alliance sentenced to seven years in prison
- Chow Hang-tung
- Former vice-chair of the Hong Kong Alliance sentenced to seven years and three months in prison
- Albert Ho
- Former chairman of the Hong Kong Alliance and Democratic Party sentenced to five years and two months in prison
- John Lee
- Chief Executive of Hong Kong who defended the court convictions
- Sarah Brooks
- China deputy director at Amnesty International
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar