Government · Hong Kong and Beijing

Hong Kong court sentences three Tiananmen vigil leaders to up to seven years

A Hong Kong court sentenced Lee Cheuk-yan, Chow Hang-tung, and Albert Ho to prison terms between five and seven-plus years for inciting subversion under the National Security Law.

AI text based on reports by europa press, Adnkronos, RFI and other publishers. Changed . How it is made

For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).

In brief

Beijing · Hong Kong, China
How it came to this
  1. 2021Hong Kong police detain and indict alliance leaders on national security charges.
  2. August 2026High court finds Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung guilty of inciting subversion.
  3. 11 SeptJudges sentence the three activists to between five and seven-plus years in prison.

Prison sentences and court rulings

A Hong Kong court sentenced three leading pro-democracy activists on 11 September 2026 to prison terms between five and seven-plus years for inciting subversion under the Beijing-imposed National Security Law. Chow Hang-tung, 41, received a sentence of seven years and three months, while Lee Cheuk-yan, 69, received seven years. Both had pleaded not guilty before their conviction in August 2026. Albert Ho, 74, who entered a guilty plea in January 2026, received a reduced sentence of five years and two months. The judges also ordered their disbanded organization, the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, to pay a fine of HK$1.5 million ($191,304). All three figures faced up to ten years in prison and have remained in custody since their indictment in 2021.

Constitutional arguments and judicial reasoning

The prosecution centered on the group's long-standing political campaigns, specifically their prominent slogan calling to end one-party dictatorship. Prosecutors argued that challenging Communist Party rule directly violated Article 1 of the Chinese constitution. The court rejected defence submissions that the activists genuinely believed they acted within legitimate free-speech protections recognized in the territory. While judges noted that the defendants used no physical violence and presented no operational timetable for political change, they ruled that the conduct carried considerable gravity because it unfolded during a period of widespread civic unrest. Both Lee and Chow indicated through their legal teams and supporters that they intend to appeal the verdicts.

Suppression of annual commemorations

The Hong Kong Alliance formed in May 1989 to support student-led pro-democracy demonstrations in Beijing before the military crackdown on 4 June 1989. For three decades, the organization held an annual candlelit vigil in Victoria Park, drawing tens of thousands of participants and reaching approximately 180,000 attendees in 2019. The gatherings served as the only large-scale public commemorations of the Tiananmen events permitted on Chinese soil alongside Macau. Following the enactment of the National Security Law in 2020, authorities effectively banned the gatherings and initiated prosecutions against the organizers. Prior to sentencing, Chow declared that the legal proceedings represented an attempt to erase public memory of 4 June by criminalizing peaceful political expression.

Domestic and international reactions

The rulings drew swift responses from government officials, human rights groups, and family members present at the courthouse. National Security Police chief Steve Li stated that the sentences provide a severe warning to anyone considering similar actions. Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee also defended the judicial outcome in an official statement.

“The law will never permit the use of human rights, democracy and freedom as a pretext to openly harm one's own country and compatriots.”

John Lee, chief Executive of Hong Kong

International organizations and foreign diplomats criticized the trial and the resulting penalties. Elaine Pearson, Asia director at Human Rights Watch, condemned the High Court decision.

“By severely punishing the activists for conducting ordinary democratic activities, the Hong Kong High Court has violated their rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.”

Elaine Pearson

Outside the courtroom, Lee's wife Elizabeth Tang stated that her husband spending three more years in detention was unacceptable, while Chow's mother urged supporters gathered outside to remain resolute.

Ask about this text

Sources and context

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar