Conflicts · Berlin and Mainz
Deutsche Bahn demands ZDF pull Hayali documentary after two factual corrections, citing skewed portrayal
The state-owned railway escalated a legal fight over the film 'Am Puls mit Dunja Hayali,' arguing that even after edits the report remains one-sided and omits billions in digitalisation investment.
AI text based on reports by Berliner Zeitung, Süddeutsche Zeitung, DIE WELT and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
ZDF revised a graphic claiming zero digital signal boxes (now three) and adjusted a punctuality comparison with Belgian rail that had mixed long-distance and overall traffic segments.
Despite corrections, the state-owned company wants the documentary deleted from the ZDF media library, arguing it is one-sided and omits billions in digitalisation spending and renovation progress.
The company says incomplete reporting that omits essential facts can be unlawful under recent Bundesgerichtshof case law, creating a distorted picture of reality.
The broadcaster says the current version has no substantive deficiencies, sees no reason for additional changes, and will not take the film offline.
- With correctionsZDF issues cease-and-desist declaration on one point, explicitly without admission of legal obligation.
- 31 July 2026Deutsche Bahn demands the documentary be depublished, citing incomplete one-sided portrayal and recent BGH case law.
- 1 August 2026ZDF refuses to take the film offline, states corrected version has no substantive deficiencies.
A documentary by German public broadcaster ZDF has spiralled into a legal standoff after Deutsche Bahn moved beyond two factual corrections to demand the entire film be removed from the broadcaster's online library.
Two corrections made under legal pressure
The railway's lawyers sent a warning letter on the day of the TV broadcast, targeting two specific claims. One was a graphic stating Germany had zero digital signal boxes; Bahn says three are now fully operational and others use partial digital components. The second was a punctuality comparison with Belgium. The original documentary compared German long-distance figures with Belgian overall passenger numbers, a mix the company called misleading. ZDF revised both passages in its media library. The number of digital signal boxes was changed from zero to three, and the Belgian comparison was adjusted to clarify it covered all passenger traffic, not just long-distance services. ZDF also issued a cease-and-desist declaration on one point, explicitly "without admission of a legal obligation" and as a gesture of accommodation.
“The current available version has no substantive deficiencies.”
Why the railway says the film is still unfair
Deutsche Bahn acknowledges the two edits but insists they do not fix a deeper distortion. The company argues the documentary systematically omits facts that would have balanced its portrayal. It points to multibillion-euro investments in rail network digitalisation, consequences drawn after the Burgrain train accident, and progress in modern signal-box technology as examples of material left out. The result, Bahn claims, is not a fair documentary but a depiction that highlights only deficits.
“Under current Federal Court of Justice case law, incomplete reporting can also be unlawful if essential facts have been omitted and a distorted picture of reality results.”
The company also says the Riedbahn line between Frankfurt and Mannheim underwent a comprehensive general renovation after which disruptions fell noticeably. On the Hamburg–Berlin route, which Hayali examines in the film, 165 kilometres of track and 678 signals were completely renewed and prepared for the digital train control system ETCS, Bahn stated in an earlier submission.
ZDF pushes back
The broadcaster rejects the criticism. A ZDF spokesperson said the documentary was journalistically carefully researched, has no substantive deficiencies, and that there is no reason for further changes. ZDF told multiple outlets it will not take the film offline. The cease-and-desist declaration the broadcaster gave was framed as a goodwill step, not a concession on the merits.
A broader debate over public broadcasting and corporate power
The conflict has triggered a sharp public discussion about whether a state-owned company should be able to pressure a public broadcaster into removing critical journalism. Reader comments collated by Focus show two camps: one argues that biased reporting with factual errors demands consequences for the presenter and the editorial team; the other defends press freedom and warns against ZDF bending to corporate pressure. Irony-laced voices note that both the railway and public broadcasting face their own deep structural problems.
Legally the case turns on how far an incomplete presentation can violate journalistic standards. Deutsche Bahn is citing a recent Federal Court of Justice ruling that treats omission of essential facts as potentially unlawful. ZDF has not publicly addressed that argument in detail, sticking instead to the position that the corrected version meets all requirements. The film remains available as of 1 August 2026.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- Berliner ZeitungDie Bahn auf Kollisionkurs mit dem ZDF - das Unternehmen sieht sich verzerrt dargestellt
- Süddeutsche ZeitungZDF-Doku: Was ist unfair, wenn es um die Bahn geht?
- DIE WELTDeutsche Bahn fordert Löschung von ZDF-Doku mit Dunja Hayali - Sender bezieht Stellung
- Der TagesspiegelSender berichtigte schon Fehler: Bahn geht weiter gegen ZDF-Doku mit Dunja Hayali vor
- Dunja Hayali
- ZDF journalist and presenter of the documentary 'Am Puls mit Dunja Hayali - Unsere Bahn: geliebt, verflucht - gefährlich?'
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar