Safety · Hamburg
Hamburg court partly lifts search order over Zeit recordings in Block trial
The Hamburg Regional Court has dropped part of its search order against a Zeit journalist and the publisher, but it keeps the seizure of recordings of the younger daughter's interview. The Hanseatic Higher Regional Court will now rule on the remaining objections.
AI text based on reports by tagesschau.de, watson.ch/, Spiegel Online and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
On 27 October the court dropped the order to search for contract documents and declared the seizure of recordings with the older daughter unlawful.
The court still holds the seizure of recordings from 15 and 16 January 2024, which Spiegel Online puts at about ten hours.
The Hanseatic Higher Regional Court must rule on whether the seizure of 12 October violated press freedom or was lawful for the trial.
Christina Block denies being accused of commissioning an Israeli security firm to take her two youngest children from Stephan Hensel in Denmark.
- 15 JanZeit journalist talks for several hours with the 13-year-old daughter, with her father, stepmother and brother present
- Late September 2026Excerpts published in the podcast Zeit Verbrechen: House of Block
- 12 OctHamburg Regional Court orders seizure of the audio recordings
- 27 OctCourt partly lifts its search order and declares seizure of recordings with the older daughter unlawful
Court scales back search order
On Tuesday, 27 October, the Hamburg Regional Court (Landgericht Hamburg) lifted parts of its own search order in the Block trial after complaints from the Zeit publisher and a Zeit journalist. The court withdrew the order to search for contract documents between the journalist or the publisher and the Block family. The chamber said it no longer believed such papers existed, because the journalist's lawyer had stated there were no written contracts and no money had been paid, and the court did not doubt those statements. The court also limited the seizure to recordings of talks held on 15 and 16 January 2024. Recordings with the older daughter were not covered by the orders, so their provisional seizure was declared unlawful. In its press release, the court put it this way:
“In light of this, the chamber has declared the provisional seizure of the recordings concerning the older daughter unlawful.”
Recordings with the younger daughter stay sealed
The chamber still holds that seizing the remaining recordings was lawful, because the material could matter for judging the children's statements and therefore for the question of guilt. The Zeit journalist talked with the 13-year-old daughter for several hours on 15 January 2024, shortly after the abduction and before detailed police interviews. Her father, his wife and her ten-year-old brother were present during the conversation, according to the court. The chamber argues that questioning a child in front of several adult authority figures can create suggestive influences on the child's testimony. Without the full conversation and the questions asked, the court says it may not be possible to assess how far it can rely on the children's later statements to police. The recordings are to remain sealed for the time being.
Background to the case
Christina Block is on trial as the defendant. She is alleged to have commissioned an Israeli security firm, after a custody dispute, to take her two youngest children from her ex-husband Stephan Hensel in Denmark and bring them to Germany. Block denies the allegation. Excerpts from the journalist's conversations were published in late September 2026 in the podcast "Zeit Verbrechen: House of Block", in which the 13-year-old daughter described her abduction in detail. Block's defence objected to this, and the daughter had earlier declined to testify as a witness in court. The journalist had held some of the conversations shortly after the abduction, and the search concerned the complete recordings, not only the published excerpts. The court seized the recordings on 12 October.
What happens next
The Hanseatic Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht Hamburg) must now decide whether the seizure violated press freedom or was necessary for the trial and therefore lawful. The Higher Regional Court will issue the final decision on these questions. Before that, the Hamburg Public Prosecutor General's office can comment first. The court's 23-page decision was published on Tuesday. Reports differ on the total volume of the audio material, with Spiegel Online citing 160 hours and tagesschau citing ten hours, while the court's focus is about ten hours of recordings from 15 and 16 January 2024.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- tagesschau.deHamburg Block trial: Dispute over Zeit recordings lands before Hanseatic Higher Regional CourtHamburger Block-Prozess: Streit um "Zeit"-Aufnahmen landet vor Hanseatischem Oberlandesgericht · original in German
- watson.ch/Seizures at Zeit: Court lifts its own search orderSicherstellungen bei "Zeit": Gericht hebt eigenen Durchsuchungsbeschluss auf · original in German
- Spiegel OnlineBlock trial and Zeit: Regional court emphasises importance of recordingsBlock-Prozess und die "Zeit": Landgericht betont Bedeutung der Aufzeichnungen · original in German
- der StandardSeizures at Zeit partly unlawful according to courtSicherstellungen bei "Zeit" laut Gericht teils rechtswidrig · original in German
- Places
- Hamburg
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar