ThreadEuropean democracies and populism

Government · Warsaw

Supreme Court rejects appeals by Constitutional Tribunal leaders Święczkowski and Sochański

On Friday, 6 November, the Supreme Court's Professional Liability Chamber ruled that it has no competence over Constitutional Tribunal judges and passed the case back to the tribunal. Both men can still appeal, and a three-judge panel would then hear the complaint.

AI text based on reports by NIEZALEZNA.PL, TVP Info, naTemat.pl and other publishers. Published . How it is made

For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).

In brief

Warsaw · Poland

The Supreme Court ruling

On Friday, 6 November, the Professional Liability Chamber of the Supreme Court (Izba Odpowiedzialności Zawodowej) rejected complaints filed by Bogdan Święczkowski and Bartłomiej Sochański against orders that suspended them from their duties. The complaints targeted two orders issued on 30 October by judge Anna Korwin-Piotrowska. The chamber concluded that it cannot hear matters concerning Constitutional Tribunal judges, and it sent the file to the tribunal as a separate judicial authority. According to Onet, the decision was taken by Supreme Court judge Zbigniew Korzeniowski alone. The operative part of the ruling states the point directly:

“The scope of the Professional Liability Chamber of the Supreme Court does not cover judges of the Constitutional Tribunal.”

Zbigniew Korzeniowski

Background to the suspension

The 30 October orders imposed an immediate one-month pause on the activities of both men, which also covered their roles as president and vice-president of the Constitutional Tribunal. TVP Info reported that the orders led to escalating protests in front of the tribunal. The same outlet described a sharper dispute between the government, the opposition and the president. The appeals to the Supreme Court were the men's response to those orders.

What comes next

The ruling does not end the matter before the Supreme Court. Święczkowski and Sochański may challenge the decision, and if they do, a three-judge panel of the Supreme Court would consider the complaint. For now the case sits with the Constitutional Tribunal, to which the Supreme Court transferred it.

This article is part of a thread

European democracies and populism

What changed since this entry:

  1. 06/11Supreme Court says it has no competence over Tribunal judges, returns Święczkowski and Sochański appeals
  2. 06/11Italy's Futuro Nazionale polls 5.8–7.9% after summer peak near 9%

Ask about this text

Sources and context

Places
Warsaw

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar