Diplomacy · Moscow, Dublin, and Abu Dhabi
Zakharova says Europe would likely be safer without NATO as Merz rejects security talks
Maria Zakharova, Russia's foreign ministry spokeswoman, responded to Chancellor Friedrich Merz's rejection of talks with Russia on Europe's security architecture.
AI text based on reports by adevarul.ro, europa press, in.gr and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
On Saturday, 14 November, Maria Zakharova said Europe would probably be safer without NATO and compared the alliance to a bad tooth.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Europe's security architecture already exists and does not need to be discussed with Russia.
After trilateral talks in Abu Dhabi on 10 and 11 November 2026, Moscow insisted a peace deal include renegotiating the European security system.
On Friday, 13 November, Volodymyr Zelensky warned that Moscow could use peace talks to weaken NATO and redraw borders in Europe.

- 10 NovTrilateral talks among Russia, Ukraine and the United States held in Abu Dhabi, running 10-11 November
- 13 NovZelensky warns Moscow could use talks to weaken NATO and redraw borders
- 14 NovZakharova calls NATO a toothache; Merz says Europe's security architecture need not be discussed with Russia
- 19 NovScheduled meeting of Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin in China
Zakharova's remarks
On Saturday, 14 November, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Europe would probably be far safer without NATO, which she called a toothache. At a press conference she said the alliance, like a bad tooth, had weakened Europe's immune system, its western and central parts, and the wider world by drawing in and consuming enormous resources for reactive measures. She went further, claiming NATO was created not for stability but for aggressive and expansionist goals, including staging coups in several countries, fostering colour revolutions and pursuing economic expansion. Her remarks answered criticism of Moscow's calls to reorganise the European security architecture.
Merz's rejection
Zakharova was responding to Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who on the same day rejected discussing European security architecture with Russia. Merz argued that the architecture already exists and that the fundamental problem is Russia's violation of international rules. He also said there can be no negotiation about Ukraine without Ukraine, and none about Europe's security without Europeans taking part.
“We do not need to talk about that, it already exists.”
Talks in Abu Dhabi and Dublin
Trilateral talks among Russia, Ukraine and the United States were held in Abu Dhabi on 10 and 11 November 2026. There Moscow insisted that any peace agreement include renegotiating the whole European security system. European leaders have refused to make that question a condition of peace negotiations, warning that Europe's security cannot be decided over the heads of European states. Leaders had already turned down Moscow's proposal at a summit in Dublin. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen argued that wider discussion of European security should follow an armistice in Ukraine.
Zelensky's warning
On Friday, 13 November, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky warned journalists that the United States and Russia wanted to change Europe's security architecture fundamentally. According to him, Washington had proposed a new security order for Europe as part of efforts to end the war in Ukraine. He said Moscow could use talks on ending the conflict to weaken NATO and redraw borders on the continent. Zelensky also said he was sure that revising security guarantees in Europe was part of Vladimir Putin's concept, and that Putin's wish to change borders was a fact. His remarks were embargoed for publication until Saturday.
What comes next
A meeting of Donald Trump, Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin in China on 19 November was also flagged in coverage, although the war in Ukraine was seen as unlikely to be discussed. Against that backdrop, the Dublin rejection, Merz's position and the Abu Dhabi talks leave the future of European security architecture unsettled. The European position reported so far, from von der Leyen, is that broader talks should come after an armistice in Ukraine.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- adevarul.roRussia's angry reaction after EU leaders rejected negotiating the security architecture: “Europe would be safer without NATO”Reacția furioasă a Rusiei, după ce liderii UE au respins negocierea arhitecturii de securitate: "Europa ar fi mai sigură fără NATO · original in Romanian
- europa pressRussia claims that Europe would be safer without the “toothache”...Rusia asegura que Europa estaría más segura sin el "dolor de muelas"... · original in Spanish
- in.grZakharova: Europe would be safer without NATOΖαχάροβα: Η Ευρώπη θα ήταν ασφαλέστερη χωρίς το ΝΑΤΟ · original in Greek
- Digi24Russia claims that Europe would be safer without NATO. Zakharova compares the Alliance to a “bad tooth”Rusia susține că Europa ar fi mai sigură fără NATO. Zaharova compară Alianța cu o "măsea stricată · original in Romanian
- Maria Zakharova
- Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman who called NATO a toothache
- Friedrich Merz
- German chancellor who rejected talks with Russia on European security architecture
- Volodymyr Zelensky
- Ukrainian president who warned that Moscow could use talks to redraw borders
- Ursula von der Leyen
- President of the European Commission who said wider security talks should follow an armistice in Ukraine
- Vladimir Putin
- Russian president, named in a planned meeting in China on 19 November
- Donald Trump
- US president, named in a planned meeting in China on 19 November
- Xi Jinping
- Chinese president, named in a planned meeting in China on 19 November
- Organizations
- NATO
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar