Macro · Bucharest
Romania narrowly avoids junk rating as Fitch initially planned downgrade, BNR advisor reveals
Eugen Rădulescu, BNR governor advisor, said Fitch initially planned to cut Romania's rating to junk, but the government and central bank provided extra information that led to a reprieve. He warned the danger is now greater due to stalled reforms.
AI text based on reports by HotNews.ro, Ziare.com, adevarul.ro and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
Fitch maintained Romania's sovereign rating at BBB-, the lowest investment grade, with a negative outlook, after initially planning a downgrade to junk.
BNR advisor Eugen Rădulescu disclosed that the initial Fitch decision was a downgrade, calling the outcome a narrow escape for a few months.
Rădulescu warned the danger is now greater because deficit reduction relied on tax hikes without the necessary structural reforms.
He cited 10,000 court cases where prosecution was halted by statute-of-limitations expirations as evidence of systemic rent extraction from the public sector.
Energy policy was criticized for price freezes and lack of storage investment, which Rădulescu called completely inept administration.
- Initial decisionFitch's initial assessment was to downgrade Romania to junk status.
- AppealRomanian government and BNR present additional information to Fitch.
- Final rating (Aug 1)Fitch maintains BBB- rating with negative outlook, citing the appeal.
- Rădulescu warning (Aug 1)BNR advisor Eugen Rădulescu warns danger is greater, reforms stalled.
Fitch's near-miss
On August 1, Fitch Ratings maintained Romania's sovereign credit rating at BBB-, the lowest investment-grade level, with a negative outlook. The agency's official statement noted that the decision followed an appeal by Romania, resulting in a different action from the initial assessment. Eugen Rădulescu, advisor to the governor of the National Bank of Romania (BNR), told Digi24 that the initial decision had been a downgrade to junk status.
“It means that the initial decision was to downgrade Romania, but as a result of additional information presented by the Government and BNR, they reconsidered and gave us a reprieve for a few months.”
He described the outcome as a narrow escape, saying "we escaped by a hair's breadth." The reprieve, however, does not eliminate the risk.
Structural reforms stalled
Rădulescu stressed that the danger has not passed and is now greater than before. The deficit reduction over the past year relied almost entirely on tax and duty increases, with very little substantive restructuring.
“Not only has the danger not passed, but it is greater than it was before. Because what happened in the last year was almost exclusively towards reducing the public deficit, especially through tax and duty increases. But very little has been done in terms of the substantive restructuring that is absolutely necessary and can no longer be delayed.”
He warned that without a credible plan to continue deficit reduction, Romania could face a downgrade within six months. Reform of state-owned companies is vital for the next evaluation, he added.
Rent extraction and energy mismanagement
The BNR advisor identified a pervasive system of "rent extraction" from the public sector. He cited 10,000 court cases where prosecution was halted due to the statute of limitations, allowing perpetrators to keep stolen funds.
“This manifests on an incredibly large scale, starting with theft. We have 10,000 cases where prosecution was stopped because the statute of limitations expired, and the perpetrators remained happily with what they stole. It's not just about the huge sums lost. It's about generating a certain incredibly pernicious system. When you know you're in a village without dogs, you don't carry a stick.”
He also criticized energy policy, calling the administration of the sector "completely inept." While acknowledging exceptional factors like drought and low Danube levels, he argued that Romania failed to increase electricity storage capacity and instead froze energy prices, discouraging prosumers.
“One of the things politicians decided in their wisdom was to freeze the price of electricity, which has the effect of bringing us closer to such a situation. When you freeze the price and give subsidies to all consumers so they can consume as much as they want, that can only lead to disaster.”
What's next
Rădulescu emphasized that Fitch has historically been more favorable to Romania, but the current trajectory is unsustainable. Without structural changes, he said, "we will reach in less than six months where we escaped by a hair's breadth in this Fitch assessment." The negative outlook signals that the rating remains under pressure, giving the government a narrow window to implement reforms that address the deep-seated issues he outlined.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- HotNews.roConsilierul guvernatorului BNR, după evaluarea Fitch: Pericolul nu a trecut, este chiar mai mare - HotNews.ro
- Ziare.comDecizia inițială a Fitch a fost de retrogradare, transmite un oficial BNR. "Pericolul este mai mare decât era înainte
- adevarul.roConsilier BNR: Fitch voia inițial să retrogradeze România. "Ne-au mai păsuit câteva luni
- Digi24Consilerul guvernatorului BNR, după evaluarea Fitch: Decizia inițială fusese de retrogradare. Pericolul nu a trecut, e mai mare
- Places
- Bucharest
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar