Elections · Washington
Republicans lose House and Senate; Vance blames Iran war, Trump defends it
Republicans lost their majorities in both the House and the Senate in the 3 November midterms. Vance now blames the war with Iran, while Trump says the decision was right even though it raised fuel prices.
AI text based on reports by polityka.pl, rmf24.pl, naTemat.pl and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
The party lost its majorities in the House and the Senate in the midterm elections held on 3 November, with results arriving that evening.
On 4 November Vance wrote on X that the party lost because of the war, arguing that disappointed voters wanted an end to the conflict and lower living costs.
Trump told the Wall Street Journal he would make the same decision again, acknowledged higher fuel prices, and said his absence from the ballot hurt turnout in an interview with The New York Times.
Vance, Marco Rubio and Ron DeSantis are cited as possible successors, and analyst Karol Szulc judged Rubio better placed to widen the party's base.
- 3 November, eveningResults show Republicans losing their majorities in the House and the Senate
- 4 NovVance posts on X that the party lost because of the war with Iran
Republicans lose both chambers
The Republican Party lost its majorities in the House of Representatives and the Senate in the midterm elections held on 3 November. The results came in on the evening of 3 November, and Republican figures began looking for someone to blame almost immediately. Reports cited by senior Republicans linked the defeat to Trump's tariff policy, the war with Iran that pushed up prices, weak candidates he backed, and a series of unconvincing campaign events in the weeks before the vote. Don Bacon, a Republican from Nebraska, told The New York Times that the vote was about Trump himself. Trump argued in an interview with the same paper that the party failed to mobilise enough voters because his name was not on the ballot.
Vance points to the Iran war
Vice President J.D. Vance wrote on X on 4 November that the party had lost because of the war, and noted that the president had said as much himself. He argued that many Americans who backed the Trump-Vance ticket in 2024 voted for Democrats this time out of disappointment rather than a change of heart. According to Vance, those voters wanted an end to the war, lower living costs, more attention to problems at home and a different approach to relations with Israel. Trump does not deny that the war hurt Republicans, and he acknowledged in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that it contributed to higher fuel prices. He nonetheless told the paper he did what needed to be done and would make the same decision again. Vance has not broken with Trump politically, though the two men now draw opposite conclusions from the same events.
Trump's defence and the race for succession
In a live phone call broadcast by Fox News, Trump described the previous two years as the best in the history of the American presidency in terms of the economy and everything his administration had done. He said he did not take the election result as a blow aimed at him personally. In Poland, Zbigniew Bogucki, the closest adviser to President Nawrocki, offered a different reading on Republika television on the morning of 4 November.
“There were those who predicted a defeat for Donald Trump and for the Republicans. That did not happen.”
The contest to succeed Trump is already taking shape, with J.D. Vance, Marco Rubio and Ron DeSantis cited as the names to watch. Karol Szulc, an American studies scholar at the University of Wroclaw, told naTemat that the Republican base remains highly organised and loyal to Trump, which makes it hard for the party to walk away from him. He judged that Marco Rubio has better prospects than Vance of widening the electorate.
“There is only one strategy: not to look at what Donald Trump or the next president does.”
Szulc also said Kansas, Mississippi and Texas being taken back from Republicans after many decades surprised him, and he urged European leaders not to wait passively for the end of Trump's term.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- polityka.plPiS and the mystery of the disappearing red hat. The chanting has ended. Trump's defeat? And who is that?PiS i tajemnica znikającej czerwonej czapki. Skończyło się skandowanie. Klęska Trumpa? A kto to taki? · original in Polish
- rmf24.plTrump lost the election. Will Republicans start to distance themselves from him? The game for the White House beginsTrump przegrał wybory. Czy republikanie zaczną się od niego odsuwać? Rusza gra o Biały Dom · original in Polish
- naTemat.plNo end for Trump. Everyone is going crazy with joy, he speaks loudly about a fatal mistakeŻaden koniec Trumpa. Wszyscy szaleją z radości, on głośno mówi o fatalnym błędzie · original in Polish
- RzeczpospolitaSettling accounts among Republicans: time to start. Many point to one person as the culprit for the defeatRozliczenia u republikanów: czas start. Wielu jako winnego porażki wskazuje jedną osobę · original in Polish
- Donald Trump
- US president whose party lost both congressional chambers in the midterms
- J.D. Vance
- US vice president who blamed the war with Iran for the party's losses
- Zbigniew Bogucki
- Closest adviser to President Nawrocki of Poland, who commented on the US midterms
- Don Bacon
- Republican congressman from Nebraska who said the vote was about Trump
- Marco Rubio
- Named as a possible successor to Trump in the Republican race
- Ron DeSantis
- Named as a possible successor to Trump in the Republican race
- Places
- Washington, United States, Washington, D.C., Iran, New York City
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar