
Portugal enacts public face-covering ban with fines up to 3,000 euros
President António José Seguro signed the legislation after parliamentary approval, establishing fines between 150 and 3,000 euros while exempting medical, professional, and religious spaces.
Presidential enactment and scope
President António José Seguro promulgated legislation on 18 August 2026 that prohibits concealing the face in public spaces across Portugal. Commonly referred to in domestic political debate as the burqa law, the statute applies broadly to masks, garments, and accessories that hide facial features or make an individual unidentifiable. The ban applies to public streets, demonstrations, public events, and sports gatherings. Infractions carry administrative fines ranging between 150 and 3,000 euros. In addition, the legislation penalizes any coercion that forces a person to conceal their face on the basis of gender, religion, age, or origin.
Legislative passage and amendments
The legislative measure began as a proposal submitted by the right-wing Chega party in October 2025. Chega leader André Ventura stated during initial debate that the bill aimed to stop women from wearing burqas in public, and that early draft included prison sentences of up to three years. Two days before the specialty committee vote, the governing centre-right Social Democratic Party (PSD) introduced a substitute text that removed specific mentions of Islamic dress, refocusing the legislation on public safety and citizen identification. Parliament gave final approval on 17 July 2026 with votes from PSD, Chega, Iniciativa Liberal, and CDS-PP, while left-wing parties voted against. The minority cabinet of Prime Minister Luís Montenegro relies on ad hoc parliamentary majorities to pass legislation.
- Chega introduces initial face-covering ban proposal in parliament
- Parliament passes amended legislation backed by PSD, Chega, IL, and CDS-PP
- President António José Seguro signs the face-covering ban into law
Legal reasoning and exemptions
Seguro, a former leader of the Socialist Party, published an explanatory note describing the legislation as a matter of great social and cultural sensitivity. The president cited jurisprudence from the European Court of Human Rights, specifically the 2014 ruling in S.A.S. v. France, which upheld national face-covering bans under the principle of living together and mutual recognition among citizens. Seguro reasoned that compelling only women to cover their faces creates an asymmetry incompatible with gender equality and human dignity.
The face must be considered a central element of human identity and communication.
The statute outlines several clear exemptions where face coverings remain permitted. Concealment is allowed for medical needs, occupational safety, weather conditions, artistic performances, entertainment, and advertising. The prohibition also does not apply inside places of worship, diplomatic and consular premises, or aboard commercial aircraft.
Reaction from the Muslim community
Sheikh David Munir, the imam of the Lisbon Central Mosque, stated that the law makes sense for security reasons and aligns with religious doctrine. Munir noted that Islam does not obligate women to conceal their faces and pointed to the hijab, which covers the hair but leaves the face exposed, as a permitted alternative. While Munir had criticized Chega's initial 2025 proposal as targeted rhetoric against immigrants, he confirmed support for the final, general security statute.
According to Islam, if a woman has an uncovered face, it is not a crime, she is not breaking God's law.
Munir estimated that fewer than 20 women wear the full burqa throughout Portugal, characterizing the practice as residual in the country. He called for educational efforts within the community to reassure Muslim women that appearing in public with an exposed face is not a religious transgression.


