Greek gynecologist remanded in custody over child pornography charges, denies knowing of files
A 52-year-old gynecologist was arrested after a US child protection organization passed information to Greek police. He was ordered remanded in custody on 12 October 2026 and denies knowing about the material found on his devices.
Arrest and evidence
Greek police's cybercrime unit arrested a 52-year-old gynecologist and obstetrician on charges of child pornography. The investigation began with information sent to the Greek authorities by an American organization that works to protect children from sexual exploitation.
After a raid on his home and medical office, police seized a mobile phone, a laptop, a hard drive and a memory card. Reports say the devices contained hundreds of files of pornography and child sexual abuse material, including material involving children under 12.
The charge covers offences committed through information systems and otherwise, involving minors under 12 and under 15 years old.
Court decision
The investigating judge and the prosecutor ordered him remanded in custody, sending him to prison while the case proceeds. The decision was reported on 12 October 2026. Remand in custody is a pre-trial measure and is not a conviction.
The defence
In his testimony he denied the charge and said he was unaware of the pornographic material found on his devices. Press coverage refers to him by the nickname "gynecologist of the people", which one outlet attributes to his public profile.
Medical association response
The Athens Medical Association (ISA) asked the prosecutor's office to disclose the gynecologist's identity details. The request was made under the association's disciplinary powers, so that its disciplinary bodies could consider possible action.
The association said in a statement:
The protection of citizens and especially of minors, and ensuring compliance with medical ethics, are non-negotiable priorities for the ISA. Respecting the work of the justice system, the association asks to be informed so that it can exercise its institutional responsibilities.
What remains open
The reports do not say when a trial date will be set or what the disciplinary bodies will decide. The case is still at the pre-trial stage.
