Government · Athens
Greek government withdraws contested article 23 from private debt bill
The provision would have let creditors enforce a debt settlement as an enforceable title, without a payment order or court ruling. Deputy finance minister Dimitris Markopoulos announced the withdrawal in parliament on 30 October.
AI text based on reports by Η Ναυτεμπορική, iefimerida.gr, NEWS 24/7 and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
Deputy finance minister Dimitris Markopoulos announced in parliament that the ministry had withdrawn article 23 from the private debt bill, while asking other parties to vote for the remaining articles.
Under the withdrawn provision, a debtor more than three instalments behind would let the creditor cancel the settlement and revive the original debt, minus amounts already paid.
The settlement contract would have served as an enforceable title, allowing forced enforcement without a payment order or court decision, according to the opposition's reading of the clause.
PASOK's Miliena Apostolaki said further amendments were needed, while ELAS's Dimitris Lyritsis warned the same rule could return in another wrapping.
What the government withdrew
The finance ministry pulled article 23 from its private debt bill while the text was under review in parliament, and deputy finance minister Dimitris Markopoulos announced the decision in the chamber on 30 October. The article would have added a new article 63E to law 5072/2023. Under it, a debtor who fell more than three instalments behind would let the creditor cancel the arrangement, reviving the original debt minus payments already made. The settlement contract itself would have become an enforceable title, so a creditor could start forced enforcement without first obtaining a payment order or court ruling.
Why opposition parties objected
Lawyers' bodies and opposition parties argued that the clause let servicers and funds order seizures and push auctions on the strength of a private agreement alone. PASOK leader Nikos Androulakis described the risk concretely: where the creditor calculates the amount owed, a short delay on a single instalment could lead to the seizure and auction of a debtor's or guarantor's property. ELAS and PASOK both said the plenary of the bar associations had been excluded from the hearing. The objections centred on the loss of judicial checks that normally protect borrowers before enforcement begins.
Party reactions
PASOK sector head Miliena Apostolaki, a party member of parliament, called the retreat disorderly and said the withdrawal was not enough. She argued that the government first tried to legislate favourable terms for the powerful and then backed down under pressure, and she asked the ministry to amend a series of other provisions. She also noted that the PASOK leader had called for the provision's withdrawal, and she asked the speaker to bring PASOK's bill to the plenary.
“The withdrawal of the provocative provision is not enough.”
SYRIZA's Nikos Pappas, who holds the economic sector portfolio, said the fight over article 23 had been won inside and outside parliament. He accused the government of wanting to let funds legislate and carry out evictions on their own. Pappas added that SYRIZA would keep fighting to abolish the "Heracles" scheme and to set up an inquiry committee on it.
“The battle to withdraw article 23 was won inside and outside parliament.”
ELAS housing sector head Dimitris Lyritsis said the government had been caught out and had fled in disarray. He argued that the retreat did not hide its real intentions, which he described as greater powers for funds and servicers and fewer guarantees for borrowers.
Government response and what comes next
Markopoulos asked opposition parties to vote for the remaining articles of the bill, and he said the new rules would end what he called servicers' recklessness. The remaining articles were still before parliament when the withdrawal was announced.
“We are withdrawing it so that there is no excuse on your part.”
Lyritsis said ELAS expected an attempt to bring back the same rule in another wrapping and that the party would keep pressing on the matter. Apostolaki said PASOK's own bill to protect borrowers should come to a plenary vote, and she called for further safeguards against abusive enforcement.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- Η ΝαυτεμπορικήPrivate debt bill: Article 23 withdrawn amid fierce criticism from the oppositionΝομοσχέδιο για το ιδιωτικό χρέος: Απεσύρθη το άρθρο 23 εν μέσω σφοδρής κριτικής από την αντιπολίτευση · original in Greek
- iefimerida.grParliament: Contested article 23 on servicers withdrawn - Markopoulos: “We will put them in their place...”Βουλή: Αποσύρθηκε το επίμαχο άρθρο 23 για τους servicers -Μαρκόπουλος: "Θα τους βάλουμε τα δυο πόδια σε ένα παπούτσι..." · original in Greek
- NEWS 24/7ELAS on withdrawal of article 23: “The government was caught red-handed”ΕΛ.Α.Σ. για απόσυρση άρθρου 23: "Η κυβέρνηση πιάστηκε με τη γίδα στην πλάτη" · original in Greek
- Ειδήσεις - νέα - Το Βήμα OnlineRed loans: Why article 23 was withdrawn and what PASOK asks for borrowersΚόκκινα δάνεια: Γιατί αποσύρθηκε το άρθρο 23 και τι ζητά το ΠαΣοΚ για τους δανειολήπτες · original in Greek
- Nikos Pappas
- SYRIZA economic sector head and member of parliament who claimed the fight over article 23 was won
- Nikos Androulakis
- PASOK leader who described the risk of enforcement on the basis of a debt settlement
- Places
- Athens
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar