Football · Auxerre and Le Mans
Ligue 1 goal-line technology awards Le Mans goal in Auxerre draw despite glove claim
Auxerre coach Will Still says the goal-line system read his goalkeeper's glove as the ball and awarded Le Mans a 48th-minute goal. The French referees' association said not all watches sounded and the VAR had no clear angle to overrule it.
AI text based on reports by watson.ch/, Il Fatto Quotidiano, Telegraaf and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
Lucas Buades headed Le Mans into a 1-0 lead in the 48th minute on Sunday, 25 October, and the goal-line technology awarded the goal, which Will Still says tracked the glove instead of the ball.
Will Still said the referees told him that only two of the four watches had sounded and that a computer problem had occurred, which he called unprecedented.
Willy Delajod reviewed the play on screen without a clear view that the ball had fully crossed the line, and the VAR did not overturn the call.
The French referees' association said that not all watches, including those of the assistant referees and the fourth official, sounded together, and that one gave no signal at all.
- 48th minuteLucas Buades heads Le Mans into a 1-0 lead, and the goal-line system awards the goal
- On-pitch reviewReferee Willy Delajod checks the play on screen and keeps the goal
- After the final whistleWill Still tells Ligue 1+ that only two of four watches sounded
- Referees' explanationThe French referees' association says the VAR had no clear angle to overrule the referee
The disputed goal
Auxerre and Le Mans drew 1-1 on Sunday, 25 October, in a Ligue 1 match settled in part by a contested goal. In the 48th minute Lucas Buades headed a deflected cross toward the short corner, and Auxerre goalkeeper Paul Nardi got a hand to it on the line without keeping it out. Referee Willy Delajod first played on, but the goal-line technology on his watch then sounded and the goal was allowed. Delajod reviewed the images on screen, and they did not clearly show that the ball had fully crossed the line, so the decision stood. According to reports of the system's image, what appeared on the line was Nardi's glove, while the ball seemed to sit exactly on it.
Will Still's account
Auxerre coach Will Still spoke to Ligue 1+ after the final whistle and said the referees had told him only two of the four watches had sounded and that a computer problem had occurred. He called this unprecedented and insisted that the system had mistaken the glove for the ball. Still said that from every angle the goal should not have been given, and that the replay from behind the goal made it impossible for the ball to have been in the net.
“I swear it is his glove that you see in the play.”
Still said the referees had admitted the error to him, a claim the reports attribute to him alone.
Nardi and the referees' explanation
Paul Nardi said he was 300% sure the ball had not crossed the line, yet he accepted the decision and said robots might be better than humans. The French referees' association said that not all watches sounded at the same time, including those of the assistant referees and the fourth official, and that one of them gave no signal at all. Because the VAR did not have an angle clear enough to overrule the referee's technology, it validated the goal. The reports do not give a further technical explanation of the fault beyond these two accounts.
Why it stands out
The goal-line technology was launched by IFAB in 2012, and 20 Minutes noted that such a fault had not previously been seen in Ligue 1. Still described the error as unprecedented, while the match finished level after Le Mans had taken the lead. Auxerre's staff were left with one point from a game they had expected to win on the field, and the club's frustration was aired in public within hours of the final whistle.
What is established
The goal is not disputed as a fact of the scoreboard, since it was allowed and stood at the final whistle. What is disputed is whether the ball crossed the line at all, and that question rests on a system image that Auxerre says showed the glove, the referees' account of partially sounding watches, and the VAR's decision not to intervene.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- watson.ch/Goalie glove instead of ball? Ligue 1 coach believes in goal-line technology malfunctionGoalie-Handschuh statt Ball? Ligue-1-Trainer glaubt an Fehlfunktion der Torlinientechnik · original in German
- Il Fatto QuotidianoGoal-line technology makes a mistake in Auxerre-Le Mans: goal validated by errorGoal-line technology sbaglia in Auxerre-Le Mans: gol convalidato per errore · original in Italian
- TelegraafAuxerre concedes ghost goal due to error in goal-line technology: “It was his glove”Auxerre incasseert spookdoelpunt door fout in doellijntechnologie: 'Het was zijn handschoen' · original in Dutch
- 20minutesAJ Auxerre victim of an “unacceptable” ghost goal against Le Mans?L'AJ Auxerre victime d'un " inacceptable " but fantôme contre Le Mans ? · original in French
- Will Still
- Auxerre coach who disputed the goal and said the referees admitted a technical fault
- Paul Nardi
- Auxerre goalkeeper who got a hand to the ball on the line
- Lucas Buades
- Le Mans player who scored the 48th-minute goal
- Willy Delajod
- Referee in the Auxerre-Le Mans match who kept the goal after reviewing the play
- Places
- Le Mans
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar