
Shanghai ranking 2026: France holds four universities in top 100 as Paris-Saclay stays 13th
The 24th Shanghai ranking, published 15 August 2026, places Paris-Saclay 13th and keeps four French universities in the global top 100, while Harvard, Stanford and MIT retain the podium.
Top of the ranking unchanged
The 24th edition of the Shanghai ranking, published on Saturday 15 August 2026, confirms the long-standing dominance of Anglo-Saxon institutions at the summit of global higher education. Harvard has held first place in every edition since the ranking was first published in 2003, followed by Stanford in second and MIT in third. Cambridge occupies fourth place. Oxford appears seventh per two sources, though one outlet lists it sixth, with Berkeley in fifth. The top twelve places remain exclusively occupied by American and British institutions.
French universities in the top 100
France maintains four institutions in the top 100, the same count as in 2025, though individual trajectories diverged. Paris-Saclay holds steady at 13th, remaining the highest-ranked university that is neither American nor British. PSL moves up one place to 33rd (from 34th in 2025), and Paris-Cité climbs three places to 57th (from 60th). The Sorbonne, by contrast, drops 12 places, falling from 43rd in 2025 to 55th this year.
- Paris-Saclay 2026
- 13 world rank
- Paris-Saclay 2025
- 13 world rank
- PSL 2026
- 33 world rank
- PSL 2025
- 34 world rank
- Sorbonne 2026
- 55 world rank
- Sorbonne 2025
- 43 world rank
- Paris-Cité 2026
- 57 world rank
- Paris-Cité 2025
- 60 world rank
Eight other French institutions appear in the top 200, including Strasbourg, Aix-Marseille, Grenoble-Alpes, and Montpellier. In total, 27 French higher-education institutions feature among the 1,000 ranked universities, placing France 10th worldwide, one spot higher than in 2025. France ranks fourth globally in the number of institutions in the top 50, tied with Switzerland, Japan, and Germany. Le Monde and Les Échos report that Chinese universities also made gains in the 2026 edition, though specific figures were not provided in the available articles.
New entries and regional developments
The Université de Bretagne occidentale (UBO), based in Brest, enters the ranking for the first time, placing between 601st and 700th. The university had previously been recognised for its work in oceanography. The Université de Rennes retains its position between 401st and 500th, where it has stood since 2023, with strengths in chemistry, mathematics, Earth sciences, water sciences, and medical technology. The Université d'Angers returns to the ranking, while Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines and Picardie-Jules-Verne Amiens, which entered in 2025, remain in the 800th to 900th band.
Government response, methodology, and criticism
The French government welcomed the results. The Ministry of Higher Education stated that the outcomes reflect the effectiveness of the policy pursued since 2017 to foster globally visible universities and support research excellence, citing the consolidation of institutions since 2018 as a factor that made France's historically fragmented scientific landscape more legible internationally. In 2016, the leading French university held 36th place and only three French institutions appeared in the top 100.
- First Shanghai ranking published; Harvard takes first place
- Leading French university ranked 36th; 3 French institutions in top 100
- PSL ranked 34th, Sorbonne 43rd, Paris-Cité 60th in previous edition
- 24th edition published; France 10th worldwide with 27 institutions; Paris-Saclay 13th
Minister of Higher Education Philippe Baptiste called the recognition meaningful in an increasingly competitive international scientific environment. His ministry nonetheless cautioned against over-reliance on a single metric.
This ranking cannot be the sole compass of our higher education and research policy.
The Shanghai ranking, produced by the independent Shanghai Ranking Consultancy, evaluates institutions on six quantitative indicators, including the number of Nobel laureates and Fields Medal recipients among alumni and faculty, the number of most-cited researchers in their disciplines, and the volume of publications in the journals Science and Nature. The criteria do not account for teaching quality within each institution. The ranking has faced regular criticism for favouring the largest institutions and is often contested despite serving as a reference for over twenty years.


