We use analytics to improve Pollar and, with your consent, the Meta pixel to measure sign-ups and purchases that come from our ads. You can change this anytime in Settings. Privacy policy

Search⌘K
HomeFor YouLiveBriefAsk
MapMarketsThreadsSoundsFilms
DomesticGeopoliticsEconomySocietyScience & TechInfrastructureSportCultureLifestyle
Support PollarNotifications
PrivacyNewsroomContactPublisher and newsroom
HomeBriefLiveThreadsSearch
Listen to the article4 min, read by a synthetic voice

In brief

  • Among 38,183 radiotherapy patients in the United States, those who looked five or more years older than their age had a 21% higher risk of dying, while those who looked five or more years younger had a 17% lower risk.

  • FAHR-FaceAge estimates biological age from the nasal folds, forehead and temples, while FAHR-FaceSurvival predicts survival from the area below the eyes and around the nasal bridge.

  • Heavy alcohol use, drug use and smoking were associated with older-looking faces, and current smokers looked older than former smokers, who looked older than people who never smoked.

Boston
Boston · United States

A model trained on a very large photo set

Researchers led by Mass General Brigham in Boston built an artificial intelligence system called FAHR-Face and reported it in The Lancet Digital Health, published on 19 October. The system was trained on more than 40 million facial photographs to pull health indicators from facial features. The team split it into two tools: FAHR-FaceAge, which estimates biological age, meaning how old the body looks, and FAHR-FaceSurvival, which predicts survival from a photo directly. Each tool reads different parts of the face. FAHR-FaceAge relies on the folds running from the sides of the nose to the mouth, the forehead above the eye sockets and the temples, while FAHR-FaceSurvival focuses on the area below the eyes and around the bridge of the nose. The authors say the cancer estimates were checked against real patient data.

Apparent age and cancer survival

The survival link was tested in 38,183 cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in the United States. Those who looked at least five years older than their actual age had a 21% higher risk of dying during follow-up, which averaged four years, than the rest of the group. Patients who looked five or more years younger had a 17% lower risk. The age model was first checked on photographs it had not seen before, and it was off by 5.1 years on average. For 4,892 radiotherapy patients, the average gap between estimated and real age grew to almost seven years, which the authors read as a sign of accelerated biological ageing. In the separate survival model, built on 34,363 photographs of cancer patients, the highest-risk quartile had more than three times the mortality of the lowest-risk quartile after adjusting for age, sex, cancer type, treatment intent and radiotherapy technique.

Change in risk of death by apparent age versus actual age% change in risk
Looked 5 or more years older21
Looked 5 or more years younger-17
Looked 5 or more years older
21 % change in risk
Looked 5 or more years younger
-17 % change in risk

Data from the article text

Lifestyle shows in faces

The researchers also found that certain lifestyle factors were linked to looking older. Heavy alcohol use, drug use and smoking were each associated with an older-looking face. Smoking showed the strongest pattern: current smokers looked older than former smokers, who in turn looked older than people who had never smoked. These are associations found in the study's photo analysis, and they sit alongside the survival results rather than replacing them.

What the researchers say and what remains open

Hugo Aerts, a co-senior author of the study, said the model learns survival risk directly from patient photographs.

“To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that an AI model can directly predict cancer survival from a simple photograph.”

Hugo Aerts

Raymond Mak, associate professor of radiation oncology at Harvard Medical School, said the team found consistent results across differences in pose, lighting, expression and makeup in real-world photos. He described the aim of the work in these terms.

“Our goal is to make face photograph-based health assessment more quantitative, consistent and scalable so it can support personalised treatment decisions rather than replace physician judgment.”

Raymond Mak

The model remains preliminary, with a long way to go before it shows clinical use. Members of the public can take part in the research by uploading a photo to the study's website and receiving their own readout.

Next in today’s edition

Israel detains 10 over West Bank settler attacksIsraeli police said on Monday, 19 October, that they had detained ten people over settler violence in the occupied West Bank, including the assault on a US photojournalist and an attack on a European diplomatic delegation the day before.Conflicts · 1 h ago
Today’s Brief · 5 min to listenRussian strikes cut power to 550,000 Ukrainian homesLive · 1 storyBrazil election court orders Meta audit

Sources and context

  • EL MUNDO2 h agoAI trained with more than 40 million faces to identify signs associated with cancer patient survival in a photographEntrenan a una IA con más de 40 millones de caras para identificar en una fotografía señales asociadas a la supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer · original in Spanish
  • Bloomberg Business3 h agoAI Tool Predicts Cancer Survival Chances With Single Face Photo
  • The Guardian3 h agoNew AI tool can predict cancer survival by a single patient selfie, study suggests
  • The Independent3 h agoOne photo 'can detect a person's biological age and chance of surviving cancer'

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar

Published today at 01:22.

Report an error in the text

Text generated by AI from the reports of the publishers listed and checked automatically, with no human editor. How Pollar is made

In this text

  1. 1A model trained on a very large photo setA model trained on a very large photo set
  2. 2Apparent age and cancer survivalApparent age and cancer survival
  3. 3Lifestyle shows in facesLifestyle shows in faces
  4. 4What the researchers say and what remains openWhat the researchers say and what remains open

Based on reports by

EL MUNDO, Bloomberg Business, The Guardian, The Independent, EL PAÍS

List of sources

Discoveries · Boston

AI model reads biological age and cancer survival risk from a single face photo

Researchers at Mass General Brigham trained FAHR-Face on more than 40 million facial photographs. In a Lancet Digital Health study, cancer patients who looked older than their actual age had a higher risk of dying after radiotherapy.

Boston

Ask about this text

AI text based on reports by EL MUNDO, Bloomberg Business, The Guardian and other publishers. Published today at 01:22.

Ask your own question
Which facial areas does FAHR-FaceAge use to estimate biological age?
How much higher is the mortality risk for patients who look five years older?
How it is made