We use analytics to improve Pollar and, with your consent, the Meta pixel to measure sign-ups and purchases that come from our ads. You can change this anytime in Settings. Privacy policy

Search⌘K
HomeFor YouLiveBriefAsk
MapMarketsThreadsSoundsFilms
DomesticGeopoliticsEconomySocietyScience & TechInfrastructureSportCultureLifestyle
Support Pollar
ContactPublisher
HomeBriefLiveThreadsSearch
Listen to the article4 min, read by a synthetic voice

In brief

  • Average one-day sick absences per worker in large firms rose from 0.22 in 2021 to 0.42 in 2024, according to Securex, while smaller firms went from 0.17 to 0.25.

  • Securex says the increase is not necessarily synonymous with abuse and may prevent longer absences, while the authors attribute the gap to the new measure.

  • The short-term absence rate over one month did not change significantly, so Securex sees no sign of higher direct wage costs, though administrative and organisational costs grew.

Brussels
Brussels · Belgium
How it came to this
  1. 2024Large-firm average reaches 0.42 one-day absences per worker, up from 0.22 in 2021
  2. 1 JanLimit cut from three to two one-day absences a year without a certificate
  3. 20 OctSecurex publishes impact analysis covering 2021 to 2024

What the analysis found

Securex, a Belgian HR service provider, published an impact analysis on Tuesday, 20 October 2026, covering 2021 to 2024 and carried out with professor Philip Verwimp of HIVA-KU Leuven and ULB. The average number of one-day sick absences per worker in large firms rose from 0.22 in 2021 to 0.42 in 2024, while smaller firms went from 0.17 to 0.25 over the same period. The increase appeared first in 2023 and grew more pronounced in 2024. Securex puts the rise at 54% more one-day sick reports, which amounts to one extra one-day absence for every eight workers. Absences of two to five days did not fall as one-day absences increased, and the total short-term absence rate for periods up to one month did not change in a statistically significant way.

One-day sick absences per worker, 2021 and 2024absences per worker
Large firms 20210.22
Large firms 20240.42
Small firms 20210.17
Small firms 20240.25
Large firms 2021
0.22 absences per worker
Large firms 2024
0.42 absences per worker
Small firms 2021
0.17 absences per worker
Small firms 2024
0.25 absences per worker

Data from the article text

Abuse or recovery?

The authors attribute the gap to the new rule, arguing that both groups of firms followed a similar trend before the measure took effect and that no other relevant change occurred in the period. Securex nonetheless states that the rise does not necessarily mean abuse. Heidi Verlinden, a project manager at Securex, said the company suspects longer-term benefits, since a single rest day can prevent a longer absence later, and pointed to an earlier study from 2021 finding that one in seven workers kept working while ill. Verlinden also said the impact is stronger among manual workers than among white-collar employees, who usually have less room to recover because of limited flexibility over leave, hours and workplace. Securex summed up its position this way.

“It does not necessarily point to abuse. The figures could also indicate that workers take time to recover sooner instead of working while sick.”

Securex

Costs and workplace effects

Securex says the direct payroll effect appears limited, because the short-term absence rate over one month did not change significantly and there are no signs of higher direct wage costs from more sick days. The indirect burden is heavier, however. Employers face extra administrative work to record each absence, schedules that must be revised at short notice, the search for replacements and higher workloads for colleagues. Securex stresses that the figures for now only show a change in behaviour, with no positive or negative intent established. The federal government has also introduced other measures, including earlier follow-up of incapacity for work and faster, more structural reintegration. Securex argues that tackling long-term sick leave requires broader action, with the greatest gains coming from preventing dropouts through workload, autonomy, leadership and dialogue.

How the rule changed

At the end of 2022, a new law allowed workers at firms with at least 50 employees to take up to three days of one-day sickness absence a year without a medical certificate. From 1 January 2026, that limit dropped to a maximum of two days a year. Securex reports that the increase in one-day absences began in 2023, after the first year of the measure. The rule was originally intended to reduce the administrative burden on general practitioners, while the new figures point to added paperwork for employers. The timeline below sets out the key steps from the 2022 change to the publication of the study.

Next in today’s edition

Lecornu promises massive police deployment for 24 October protestsParis set a curfew for minors around République and Les Halles for the night of 20 October, while Lyon imposed its own night curfew in part of the centre.Safety · 50 min ago
Today’s Brief · 5 min to listenDrone strike kills 153 people at Abyei marketLive · 2 storiesUkraine peace talks in Miami

Sources and context

  • 7sur711 h agoDoes the end of the medical certificate for one-day absences encourage abuse?La fin du certificat médical pour les absences d'un jour favorise-t-elle les abus? · original in French
  • vrtnws.be18 h agoAbolition of sick note leads to more than half as many one-day sick reportsAfschaffing van ziektebriefje leidt tot ruim de helft meer ziekmeldingen voor 1 dag | VRT NWS Nieuws · original in Dutch
  • De Standaard19 h agoOne-day sick leave has risen sharply since the abolition of the doctor's noteEendaags ziekteverlof sterk gestegen sinds afschaffing doktersattest · original in Dutch
  • RTBF19 h agoAbsences for one-day illness increase since the removal of the medical certificateLes absences pour maladie d'un jour augmentent depuis la suppression du certificat médical - RTBF Actus · original in French

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar

Published yesterday at 23:52.

Report an error in the text

Text generated by AI from the reports of the publishers listed and checked automatically, with no human editor. How Pollar is made

In this text

  1. 1What the analysis foundWhat the analysis found
  2. 2Abuse or recovery?Abuse or recovery?
  3. 3Costs and workplace effectsCosts and workplace effects
  4. 4How the rule changedHow the rule changed

Based on reports by

7sur7, vrtnws.be, De Standaard, RTBF, La Libre.be, Le Soir

List of sources

Health & Education · Brussels

One-day sick absences up 54% in large Belgian firms, Securex study finds

Large Belgian firms recorded a sharp rise in one-day sick absences after the medical certificate requirement was lifted, according to HR provider Securex. The company says the increase does not necessarily signal abuse.

Brussels

Ask about this text

AI text based on reports by 7sur7, vrtnws.be, De Standaard and other publishers. Published yesterday at 23:52.

Ask your own question
What is the current limit for sick days without a medical certificate?
How did the average number of one-day sick absences change in large firms?
How it is made