We use analytics to improve Pollar and, with your consent, the Meta pixel to measure sign-ups and purchases that come from our ads. You can change this anytime in Settings. Privacy policy

Search⌘K
HomeFor YouLiveBriefAsk
MapMarketsThreadsSoundsFilmsRadar
DomesticGeopoliticsEconomySocietyScience & TechInfrastructureSportCultureLifestyle
Support Pollar
ContactPublisher
HomeBriefLiveThreadsSearch

For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).

In brief

  • All five judges, Maciej Berek, Marcin Dziurda, Anna Korwin-Piotrowska, Krystian Markiewicz and Maciej Taborowski, state in their 23 October 2026 statement that none took the oath before the Sejm Marshal, citing notarised oath acts delivered to President Karol Nawrocki.

  • TK president Bogdan Święczkowski has not admitted the five judges, and the president's request to the Tribunal, filed at the end of April, states the Sejm actions had no legal effect on taking office.

  • According to oko.press, all judges except Maciej Berek have been unable to adjudicate for months without salary, and Anna Korwin-Piotrowska has no income while her spouse pays her health insurance.

  • Per oko.press, the Sejm declined to fix the problem and referred the judges to the TK president, and the Foreign Ministry is now to look for a solution.

How it came to this
  1. MarchFour judges elected by the Sejm to the Tribunal
  2. SeptemberMaciej Berek elected by the Sejm to the Tribunal
  3. End of AprilPresident files request to the Tribunal on the oath dispute
  4. 23 OctFive judges issue statement rejecting the dispute

The oath dispute

Five judges elected by the Sejm to the Constitutional Tribunal (TK) have not been admitted to adjudicate. TK president Bogdan Święczkowski and representatives of President Karol Nawrocki both point to a competence dispute over the judges' oath as the reason. The judges are Maciej Berek, Marcin Dziurda, Anna Korwin-Piotrowska, Krystian Markiewicz and Maciej Taborowski. In a statement dated 23 October 2026, they argue that the dispute does not exist and that the oath was taken solely before the president, not the Marshal of the Sejm.

Why the judges reject the dispute

According to the judges, a competence dispute arises only when more than one body wants to exercise the same power, or when none wants to. They argue the president has no competence in the matter, since the oath is a duty owed to the president and the law assigns him no role in accepting it. Even if he had one, no other body is claiming it. The Marshal of the Sejm, they note, assigns himself no competence over judges' oaths and does not say the oath was made before him. They add that the alleged dispute cannot be resolved without a full Tribunal bench and does not suspend their admission.

The president's position and the Tribunal request

The presidential chancellery holds that the oath taken in the Sejm had no legal effect. Its request to the Tribunal, filed at the end of April, states that the actions carried out in the Sejm produced no legal consequences for taking up the office of TK judge. Neither Nawrocki nor Święczkowski accepts the Sejm ceremonies as a valid oath. The judges' statement accuses Święczkowski and presidential representatives of invoking an unjustified pretext. Wpolityce.pl reports that the president has not confirmed the judges' version of events.

Pay and the wait for admission

According to oko.press, every judge except Maciej Berek, who was elected more recently, has been unable to adjudicate for months and receives no salary. The judges rely on savings and modest pay from university work, and Anna Korwin-Piotrowska has no income at all, with her health insurance paid by her spouse. The same outlet reports that the Sejm, which elected them under the ruling coalition's nominations, declined to resolve the problem and referred them to the TK president, who in its account is unlawfully blocking them. The Foreign Ministry is now to look for a solution. The judges' statement demands that they be admitted to adjudication.

In this text

  1. 1The oath disputeThe oath dispute
  2. 2Why the judges reject the disputeWhy the judges reject the dispute
  3. 3The president's position and the Tribunal requestThe president's position and the Tribunal request
  4. 4Pay and the wait for admissionPay and the wait for admission

Based on reports by

Rzeczpospolita, wpolityce.pl, oko.press, NIEZALEZNA.PL

List of sources
Warsaw
Warsaw
Warsaw · Poland

Next in today’s edition

Israel seals West Bank after Hebron checkpoint attackIsraeli forces launched a multi-day operation around Hebron after two gunmen killed two soldiers at a checkpoint on Friday, 23 October.Conflicts · 15 min ago
Today’s Brief · 5 min to listenMelania Trump brokers Oleshky truce for Ukraine evacuationLive · 1 storyUkraine war updates

Sources and context

  • Rzeczpospolita2 h agoNon-admitted TK judges: Competence dispute is a pretext to block us from adjudicatingNiedopuszczeni sędziowie TK: Spór kompetencyjny to pretekst, by nas nie dopuścić do orzekania · original in Polish
  • wpolityce.pl17 h agoWho do they want to convince? TK “judges” with an absurd positionKogo oni chcą przekonać? "Sędziowie" TK z niedorzecznym stanowiskiem · original in Polish
  • oko.press20 h agoFive TK judges to Nawrocki and Święczkowski: You have no right to block us from adjudicatingPięciu sędziów TK do Nawrockiego i Święczkowskiego: Nie macie prawa blokować nas w orzekaniu · original in Polish
  • NIEZALEZNA.PL21 h agoFive people elected to the TK make demands. They want to adjudicate without swearing an oath before the presidentPięcioro wybranych do TK wysuwa żądania. Chcą orzekać bez ślubowania wobec prezydenta · original in Polish
Karol Nawrocki
President of Poland whose chancellery disputes the judges' oath
Maciej Berek
Judge elected by the Sejm to the Constitutional Tribunal in September, one of the five

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar

Published today at 12:37.

Report an error in the text

Text generated by AI from the reports of the publishers listed and checked automatically, with no human editor. How Pollar is made

Government · Warsaw

Five judges barred from the Constitutional Tribunal call oath dispute non-existent

The five Sejm-elected judges say they swore the oath only before President Karol Nawrocki, not the Sejm Marshal, and that the dispute cited to block them does not exist. Their statement is dated 23 October 2026.

AI text based on reports by Rzeczpospolita, wpolityce.pl, oko.press and other publishers. Published today at 12:37.

Ask about this text

Ask your own question
Who are the five judges elected to the Constitutional Tribunal?
What is the date of the statement issued by the five judges?
How it is made