In brief
Attorney Alex Spiro sent a letter dated 3 September warning Alex Gibney, Jigsaw, HBO, Bleecker Street, and Universal of potential legal action over the film.
Musk's legal team contested a sequence connecting Starlink satellites to early knowledge of Donald Trump's 2024 presidential election victory.
Production company Jigsaw stated to The Hollywood Reporter that critical scrutiny of public figures is protected under the First Amendment, citing Musk's self-description as a free speech absolutist.
The documentary runs for 3 hours and 45 minutes, debuted out of competition at the Venice Film Festival, and is scheduled for theatrical release on 16 October.

- 3 SeptAttorney Alex Spiro sends a warning letter alleging defamation and lack of fact-checking
- 8 SeptDocumentary Musk premieres out of competition at the Venice Film Festival
- 16 OctDocumentary opens in cinemas for general theatrical release
Legal challenges over Venice premiere
Lawyers representing Elon Musk have issued formal warnings threatening defamation litigation against director Alex Gibney and the entertainment companies backing his biographical documentary. In a legal letter dated 3 September, attorney Alex Spiro accused Gibney of building the film, titled "Musk", around predetermined conclusions rather than conducting an impartial investigation. The warning named Gibney's production firm Jigsaw alongside distributors and platforms including HBO, Bleecker Street, and Universal. Spiro claimed the filmmakers refused to verify material with Musk or his entourage before screening the documentary out of competition at the Venice Film Festival, where it received an extended standing ovation.
Starlink election claims and director findings
Musk's legal team focused particular criticism on a sequence examining the 2024 United States presidential election. Spiro objected to suggestions in the film that Musk possessed advance knowledge of Donald Trump's victory through potential election manipulation involving Starlink satellites. Gibney expanded the documentary's scope after Musk took an advisory role under Trump aimed at reducing federal government agencies. Discussing the multi-year investigation, Gibney noted the intense hesitation many potential witnesses displayed before agreeing to speak on camera.
“One of the things that struck me most was, especially at the beginning, the enormous fear people had of speaking. It is almost an existential fear, both among his critics, among his business colleagues, and among his friends.”
First Amendment defense and industry response
Production company Jigsaw defended the documentary in a statement released to The Hollywood Reporter, arguing that critical reporting on powerful public figures is firmly protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. The company noted that constitutional speech protections should be respected by all citizens, specifically referencing Musk's own self-identification as a free speech absolutist. Industry trade publications published initial reactions following the Italian premiere, with Variety describing the documentary as a vitriolic portrait and Deadline reporting that the film depicts Musk as petty, narcissistic, and cruel.
Runtime, interviews, and theatrical release
The documentary runs for three hours and 45 minutes, a duration that includes a 10-minute intermission. Gibney charts Musk's trajectory from his childhood in South Africa through early Silicon Valley startups, Tesla, SpaceX, his 14 children, and his acquisition of Twitter. The film features on-camera testimonies from Tesla co-founder Martin Eberhard, Musk's first wife Justine Wilson, his father Errol Musk, and influencer Ashley St. Clair, who faced online abuse after filing a paternity lawsuit against Musk. The visual presentation incorporates a satirical artificial intelligence avatar of Musk within a video game setting ahead of the film's theatrical debut on 16 October.