
Greek government and opposition spar over 7.5 billion euro economic plan
Government spokesperson Pavlos Marinakis accused Alexis Tsipras of political deception, while ELAS economic head Fragkiskos Koutentakis rejected claims that their fiscal plan costs 30 billion euros.
Clash over Thessaloniki economic agenda
Greek government spokesperson and Deputy Minister to the Prime Minister Pavlos Marinakis issued a public statement on the morning of September 12 attacking the fiscal plan of the Hellenic Left Coalition (ELAS). The controversy focuses on the economic program presented by former prime minister Alexis Tsipras in Thessaloniki. Marinakis based his statement on a television appearance made on the evening of September 11 on Action24 by Fragkiskos Koutentakis, the head of the economic sector for ELAS. The government spokesperson asserted that Koutentakis contradicted the presentation delivered by Tsipras by identifying the headline 7.5 billion euro figure as an annual expenditure rather than a total four-year program budget.
Specifically, Mr. Koutentakis stated, at least four times, that the notorious 7.5 billion is annual expenditure and not the costing of the four-year program, as Mr. Tsipras falsely claimed in Thessaloniki.
Government alleges four-year cost multiplication
Following the Action24 broadcast, Marinakis argued that counting 7.5 billion euros in annual spending produces an aggregate financial commitment of 30 billion euros over a standard four-year parliamentary term. The government spokesperson described this discrepancy as political deception against Greek voters. Marinakis further maintained that even this 30 billion euro figure underestimates the true financial commitments required by the opposition platform. He cited previous statements by party leaders to argue that the opposition had presented an incomplete financial picture to the public.
- Fragkiskos Koutentakis discusses the ELAS economic program on Action24
- Pavlos Marinakis releases a statement accusing Alexis Tsipras of political deception
- Fragkiskos Koutentakis issues a rebuttal detailing annual budget flow methodology
ELAS defends annual fiscal flow accounting
Koutentakis issued a detailed rebuttal later on September 12, rejecting Marinakis's calculations and accusing ruling New Democracy (ND) representatives of inventing arbitrary fiscal metrics. The ELAS economic policy head explained that public expenditures and state revenues are standard financial flows that occur within specific fiscal periods and are recorded on an annual basis in national budgets. Koutentakis stated that this annual method represents the standard approach used to prepare and monitor state budgets for decades. He maintained that the 7.5 billion euro figure represents the permanent expansion of the annual budget by 2030, reached incrementally over four years.
In any case, for those who pretend not to understand, we repeat: the total scale of our program is 7.5 billion with gradual implementation over four years. Which means that in 2030 the budget will have expanded by 7.5 billion compared to today. It is neither 13, nor 18, nor 30, nor 40 billion. It is 7.5 billion.
Discrepancies in government cost evaluations
In his response, Koutentakis also criticized the administration over internal inconsistencies among officials evaluating the ELAS platform. He pointed to differing price tags announced by various government figures, noting that Kontogeorgis had estimated the measures at 18 billion euros, while Pierrakakis had previously calculated a cost of 40 billion euros. Koutentakis argued that Marinakis had arbitrarily revised Kontogeorgis's estimate down to 13 billion euros and Pierrakakis's estimate down to 30 billion euros.
- ELAS 2030 budget addition (Koutentakis)
- 7.5 € billion
- Marinakis four-year calculation
- 30 € billion
- Kontogeorgis estimate (cited by Koutentakis)
- 18 € billion
- Pierrakakis estimate (cited by Koutentakis)
- 40 € billion
- Prior Marinakis figure (cited by Koutentakis)
- 13 € billion
The economic spokesman also referenced earlier government statements regarding proposed reductions to unemployment benefits, characterizing the current costing dispute as part of an ongoing pattern of government misrepresentations regarding opposition policies.


