We use analytics to improve Pollar and, with your consent, the Meta pixel to measure sign-ups and purchases that come from our ads. You can change this anytime in Settings. Privacy policy

Search⌘K
HomeFor YouLiveBriefAsk
MapMarketsThreadsSoundsFilmsRadar
DomesticGeopoliticsEconomySocietyScience & TechInfrastructureSportCultureLifestyle
Support Pollar
ContactPublisher
HomeBriefLiveThreadsSearch

For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).

In brief

  • The Competition Council fined ten banks a total of 3.73 billion lei (710 million euros) for coordinating behaviour in setting the ROBOR benchmark rate.

  • The Sector 1 District Court and the Bucharest Court of Appeal dismissed requests from two banks to suspend hearings, deliberations, and the drafting of the decision.

  • President Chirițoiu stated that the exchange of information among banks produced the same effect as a classic price-fixing cartel, even without an explicit agreement on a specific rate.

  • The Council's leadership mandates expire in mid-July, creating urgency to finalise and sign the reasoned decision before the judicial recess.

How it came to this
  1. 9 JunBucharest Court of Appeal rejects Raiffeisen suspension request as inadmissible
  2. 9 JunLast court hearing on bank challenges takes place; court confirms no legal basis
  3. July 2026Competition Council leadership mandates expire; reasoned decision must be signed before deadline

The record fine

Romania's Competition Council announced on Sunday, 7 June, that it had sanctioned ten banks with a combined fine of 3.73 billion lei (710 million euros) for coordinating their behaviour in setting the ROBOR index, the benchmark used to calculate interest on loans to Romanian households and businesses. The penalty is the largest in the institution's history. The ten banks have three months to submit a compliance plan, according to Council president Bogdan Chirițoiu.

“There is no difference between what I call a classic cartel and this exchange of information between banks. The result is the same.”

Bogdan Chirițoiu, president of the Romanian Competition Council

The mechanism

Chirițoiu described the conduct as falling short of an explicit agreement to fix a specific rate, but argued that the transparency of the fixing process made such an agreement unnecessary. Banks could see each other's quotes and align accordingly. The investigation, which began in 2022, found numerous contacts among staff at the participating banks and exchanges about methodology and rate movements.

“There were many contacts between the staff of the banks involved in ROBOR fixing, and the system as it is applied allows the viewing of quotations.”

Bogdan Chirițoiu, president of the Romanian Competition Council

Banks go to court

Two of the sanctioned banks, identified by judicial sources as Raiffeisen Bank and BCR, filed separate actions at the Sector 1 District Court and the Bucharest Court of Appeal seeking to suspend hearings, deliberations, and the drafting of the decision. The Competition Council said one bank also sought access to protected documents without following legal procedures. Both courts rejected the requests as inadmissible. The last hearing took place on Monday morning, 9 June.

“Never in the history of the Competition Council has something like this happened: the banks tried every avenue, whether at the district court or the Court of Appeal, to block the completion of the investigation.”

Bogdan Chirițoiu, president of the Romanian Competition Council

Pressure and timing

Chirițoiu said the banks mounted a public campaign to influence the decision before the Council had even held hearings. He described the effort as intentional confusion designed to put pressure on the institution. The timing was sensitive: the mandates of the Competition Council's leadership expire in mid-July. If the drafting of the decision had been suspended, there was a risk that no one would be available to sign it before the judicial recess, potentially allowing the banks to challenge the fine as unsigned and legally invalid.

What comes next

The Council aims to complete the reasoned decision within one month so that the fines can be signed by the current leadership. The banks have five days to appeal the court rulings rejecting their suspension requests. All ten lenders have announced they will contest the fines. Chirițoiu noted that the reasoned decision has not yet been published or sent to the banks, and that the report has been forwarded to the European Commission for validation. He also pointed to an EU directive that allows parties who suffered harm to bring civil actions for damages, with a presumption that prices in cartel cases are 20 percent higher, though no such action has ever been brought in Romania.

ROBOR fines by bankmillion lei
Banca Transilvania875.74
BCR577.36
Raiffeisen Bank442.49
UniCredit Bank431.03
BRD412.47
ING Bank405.91
CEC Bank332.98
Exim Banca Românească96.49
Banca Transilvania (OTP)85.03
Libra Internet Bank45.86
Intesa Sanpaolo28.1
Banca Transilvania
875.74 million lei
BCR
577.36 million lei
Raiffeisen Bank
442.49 million lei
UniCredit Bank
431.03 million lei
BRD
412.47 million lei
ING Bank
405.91 million lei
CEC Bank
332.98 million lei
Exim Banca Românească
96.49 million lei
Banca Transilvania (OTP)
85.03 million lei
Libra Internet Bank
45.86 million lei
Intesa Sanpaolo
28.1 million lei

Data from the article text

In this text

  1. 1The record fineThe record fine
  2. 2The mechanismThe mechanism
  3. 3Banks go to courtBanks go to court
  4. 4Pressure and timingPressure and timing
  5. 5What comes nextWhat comes next

Based on reports by

G4Media.ro, Stirile ProTV, Libertatea, Mediafax.ro, adevarul.ro, Digi24

List of sources
Bucharest
Bucharest
Bucharest · Romania

Next in today’s edition

Paris-area shooting leaves one dead; anti-terror probe openedA man opened fire from a car in Trappes and La Verrière on Friday, 23 October, killing one person and injuring five.Safety · 2 h ago
Today’s Brief · 5 min to listenAnti-terror prosecutors take over Paris-area shooting after gunman kills oneLive · 2 storiesFire at Bavaria's Kehlsteinhaus

Sources and context

  • G4Media.roon 10 Jun at 15:44Chirițoiu: Nu e nicio diferență între ce numesc eu cartel clasic și acest schimb de informații între bănci
  • Stirile ProTVon 10 Jun at 15:23Băncile au încercat să oprească ancheta Consiliului Concurenței. "Niciodată în instorie nu s-a mai întâmplat așa ceva" - Știrile ProTV
  • G4Media.roon 10 Jun at 15:06Bogdan Chirițoiu: A fost un efort de a influența decizia Consiliului Concurenței legată de stabilirea ROBOR
  • Libertateaon 10 Jun at 14:18Consiliul Concurenței a câștigat în instanță primele procese cu Raiffeisen și BCR în privința manipulării ROBOR
Bogdan Chirițoiu
President of the Romanian Competition Council, leading the ROBOR manipulation investigation

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar

Published on 10 Jun at 15:50.

Report an error in the text

Text generated by AI from the reports of the publishers listed and checked automatically, with no human editor. How Pollar is made

Business · Bucharest

Romania's Competition Council wins first court battles as banks try to block record ROBOR manipulation fines

Two Romanian banks lost court bids to suspend the Competition Council's investigation into ROBOR manipulation, clearing the way for the agency to finalize a record 3.73 billion lei fine against ten lenders.

AI text based on reports by G4Media.ro, Stirile ProTV, Libertatea and other publishers. Published on 10 Jun at 15:50.

Ask about this text

Ask your own question
How it is made