
US Secret Service confiscates White House press passes for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico
Security officers at the West Wing deactivated electronic badges and confiscated physical passes on Saturday morning following a directive from Donald Trump.
Access blocked at security checkpoints
The United States Secret Service began confiscating press credentials on Saturday morning, barring journalists and camera crews from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from entering the White House complex. Reporters encountered the restriction at security checkpoints outside the West Wing, where metal detector scanners displayed red lights indicating that their electronic passes had been deactivated. Security officers collected the physical badges and informed personnel that the directive originated from higher authorities. Politico editor-in-chief Jonathan Greenberger notified his newsroom that Secret Service officers had turned away reporter Cheyenne Haslett and seized her credential. MS NOW reporter Akayla Gardner and a network camera operator were likewise blocked at the gate, prompting Gardner to conduct her reporting from outside the grounds.
The White House belongs to the American people and the decisions made inside are funded with our tax dollars.
The presidential directive
The physical expulsions followed a Friday announcement by Donald Trump, who posted on social media that CNN, MS NOW (formerly MSNBC), and Politico were barred with immediate effect for publishing false stories. Although reporters from the targeted networks continued working inside West Wing press workspaces immediately after the post on Friday, Secret Service agents enforced the order the following morning. Speaking to reporters inside the Oval Office shortly after his announcement, Trump stated that he did not want correspondents from those outlets present in his workspace or inside the building. He also cautioned that the ban could expand to encompass additional publications, specifically naming The New York Times and The Washington Post.
It is a very simple veto. I do not want them in my office, I do not want them here... I would say the veto will go as far as it can go.
- Donald Trump declares an immediate White House access ban on CNN, MS NOW, and Politico
- Donald Trump states the restriction will go as far as possible and warns other outlets could follow
- Secret Service deactivates badges and confiscates press passes at West Wing security checkpoints
Legal challenges and media response
The three affected media organisations stated that they will initiate legal proceedings to protect their rights under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. MS NOW released a statement affirming its support for its editorial staff and committing to report on the administration regardless of physical exclusions. CNN announced that its correspondents will continue covering the federal government despite attempts to restrict physical access to the White House and other official buildings. To lead its legal challenge, CNN retained First Amendment attorney Ted Boutros to challenge the administration in court. Politico similarly confirmed that it will defend its reporting access, noting that its journalists intend to cover both the current administration and future presidencies.
Precedents and free press reactions
The mass revocation follows earlier executive restrictions imposed on specific news organisations over editorial policies. The White House had previously barred The Associated Press from the Oval Office, Air Force One, and other official locations after the wire service declined to adopt the name Gulf of America. Similar credentialing disputes had previously affected correspondents from The Wall Street Journal. Clayton Weimers of Reporters Without Borders criticised the decision, stating that restricting access to the press corps represents an attempt to control public information. Media legal analysts noted that while administrations have occasionally revoked passes from individual journalists in the past, blocking entire news organisations represents a new level of institutional restriction.


