Swiss voters decide on the Fireworks Restriction Initiative on 29 November, and a yes would require approval from both the people and the cantons.
Environment Minister Albert Rösti told the media in Bern on Thursday, 22 October, that the government opposes a nationwide ban because fireworks emissions are temporary and comparatively low.
The Federal Council says cantons and municipalities can already restrict fireworks, and many cities have restricted or banned them, with the dry summer cited as proof that federalism works.
Rösti warned that a large part of the Swiss fireworks market would disappear, and the Federal Council says buying fireworks abroad would have negative safety consequences.
A first 20 Minuten poll by Leewas shows a clear majority in favour of the initiative ahead of the 29 November ballot.
The Fireworks Restriction Initiative asks for a ban on fireworks that produce noise. Under the proposal, loud products such as firecrackers and bangers could no longer be sold to private individuals, and private people could no longer set them off. Silent fireworks such as table fireworks, sparklers, bengal lights and Roman candles would not be affected. Supporters point to noise, litter and fine particulate matter, and say animals and people suffer from the din. The text would allow exemptions for large supra-regional events such as the Swiss National Day, granted by the cantons, but a private firecracker display in a back garden would be banned.
Environment Minister Albert Rösti presented the government's case to the media in Bern on Thursday, 22 October. He said the Federal Council is aware that loud fireworks bother some people and can cause severe reactions in animals. The government nevertheless considers the noise and fine particulate emissions temporary and comparatively low, so nationwide limits on sale and use would be unnecessary and disproportionate. Rösti acknowledged that the topic is being widely debated, saying:
“The initiative takes up an issue that gives cause for discussion.”
Rösti argued that cantons and municipalities already have the tools to act. Many cities have already restricted or banned fireworks in their areas, and local authorities can limit use during drought or in specific places. He said the dry summer showed that federalism works and that the existing rules leave enough room to prevent misuse. On the current regime, he said:
“Handling fireworks is well regulated today.”
He added that the initiative ignores local conditions, since local authorities could no longer act on their own if voters and cantons said yes. A general ban would also be too heavy an intervention, because fireworks at weddings and birthdays would no longer be possible.
Rösti said the initiative goes too far for economic reasons as well. He warned that a large part of the Swiss fireworks market would disappear, with many companies closing or moving abroad. The Federal Council also argues that buying fireworks abroad would carry negative safety consequences. Rösti described fireworks as a sign of joy and tradition for many people, tied to celebrations such as weddings and birthdays. The Federal Council also notes that fireworks are traditional on public holidays, above all New Year's Eve and the 1 August national holiday.
Voters decide on the initiative on 29 November. Parliament and the Federal Council both oppose the ban, and for the proposal to pass it would need a majority of voters and of cantons. A first 20 Minuten poll by Leewas shows a clear majority in favour of the initiative, and the outlet expects Rösti to face a difficult fight. The key dates in the process are the Federal Council's recommendation on 22 October and the ballot on 29 November.
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support PollarGovernment · Bern
The Federal Council wants voters to reject the fireworks initiative on 29 November, arguing that cantons and municipalities already have the legal tools to restrict fireworks.
AI text based on reports by SRF News, SWI swissinfo.ch and 20 Minuten. Published .