StoryOrban re-elected as Fidesz leader

Government · Budapest

Hungary limits prime minister terms to eight years, preventing Viktor Orbán from ever returning to power

The Hungarian parliament voted on Monday to restrict any future prime minister to two terms, a reform that excludes Viktor Orbán after his 20 years in office and fulfills a key campaign pledge by new premier Péter Magyar.

AI text based on reports by BBC, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Frankfurter Allgemeine and other publishers. Changed . How it is made

For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).

In brief

Budapest · Hungary
How it came to this
  1. 12 AprTisza wins parliamentary election with two-thirds supermajority
  2. May 2026Péter Magyar sworn in as prime minister
  3. 15 JunParliament approves constitutional amendment capping PM terms at two

A sweeping constitutional change

Hungary’s parliament approved a constitutional amendment on Monday that limits a prime minister to a maximum of two four-year mandates. The vote, which passed 135 to 50 with 6 abstentions, was driven by the ruling Tisza party of Péter Magyar and needed only the signature of President Tamás Sulyok to take effect. The measure applies retroactively to all terms served since 2 May 1990, meaning Viktor Orbán, who governed for a total of 20 years across five terms, can never again hold the office.

“The Orban law has just been voted through. That was the most pressing issue. If I’m needed, I’ll be here.”

Viktor Orbán, former prime minister of Hungary and leader of the Fidesz party

Magyar fulfills his central promise

During the April election campaign, Magyar repeatedly promised to prevent a permanent concentration of power. His Tisza party won a two-thirds supermajority on 12 April, giving it the tools to revise the constitution without a referendum. Magyar himself took office in May and will now be able to serve only until 2034, even if he wins two subsequent elections.

The reform was introduced by two Tisza MPs as an individual motion, a fast-track procedure that Orbán’s Fidesz had itself used for years when in opposition. Fidesz lawmakers voted against the amendment, and Balázs Orbán, the former prime minister’s political director, accused Magyar of “using political power to exclude a political opponent from democratic competition.”

“He is using political power to exclude a political opponent from democratic competition.”

Balázs Orbán, former political director to Viktor Orbán

Dismantling the Orbán-era apparatus

The amendment also scrapped the constitutional basis for the Sovereignty Protection Office, created in 2023 to monitor “undue political interference” by foreign interests. Critics had long viewed the body as a tool to intimidate NGOs and opposition groups. Additionally, the legal groundwork was laid to bring so-called KEKVA public trust foundations back under direct state control. These foundations, into which the previous government had transferred assets and management of universities and cultural institutions, were often staffed with Fidesz loyalists.

Vote on the constitutional amendment
Yes
135
No
50
Abstentions
6

Data from the article text

Eyes on EU funds

For four consecutive years Transparency International has ranked Hungary as the EU’s most corrupt member state. Brussels withheld billions of euros over rule-of-law concerns, but last month the European Commission agreed to unlock €16.4 billion in funding provided Budapest enacts a package of anti‑corruption reforms. The measures now moving through parliament are partly designed to meet those conditions.

“Hungary has been labelled the most corrupt country in the European Union for four years running.”

Transparency International

A parliamentary system with a presidential twist

Although term limits are common in presidential systems, they are rare in parliamentary democracies where voters elect parties, not directly a head of government. Legal analysts noted that the retroactive application effectively targets one person and restricts the parliament’s freedom to choose the candidate it deems most suitable. Future governments with a two-thirds majority could theoretically reverse the amendment, but for now the path back for Orbán is closed.

Ask about this text

Sources and context

Places
Budapest

Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.

Support Pollar