Football · Ljubljana
Thirteen World Cup nations reject UEFA president's criticism of 48-team format as 'deeply disappointing'
Football federations from 13 nations, including debutants Cape Verde, Curacao and Uzbekistan, issued a joint statement rejecting Aleksander Ceferin's description of some matches as 'completely uninteresting'.
AI text based on reports by BBC, NOS, The New York Times and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin said the move to 48 teams produces many matches that are 'completely uninteresting', sparking immediate backlash.
Cape Verde, Curacao, Uzbekistan, DR Congo, Haiti, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Egypt, Ghana, Senegal, Ivory Coast and South Africa released a statement expressing profound disappointment and rejecting the comments.
Cape Verde, Curacao and Uzbekistan emphasised that reaching the World Cup for the first time is a dream realised for generations, not a minor event.
The federations argued that football does not belong to a select group of nations and that every qualified team deserves respect on merit.
Ceferin's remarks
Aleksander Ceferin, president of UEFA, reportedly told a conference in Ljubljana, Slovenia, that expanding the World Cup from 32 to 48 teams leads to a surplus of uninteresting matches. Slovenian outlet Delo quoted him as saying:
“We have a lot of matches that are completely uninteresting.”
Thirteen federations push back
On Sunday, 13 football federations – Cape Verde, Curacao, Uzbekistan, DR Congo, Haiti, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Egypt, Ghana, Senegal, Ivory Coast and South Africa – released a joint statement expressing "profound disappointment". They rejected Ceferin's classification of their matches as less important. One Dutch report named Jordan as an additional drafter, bringing the count to 14, but the published statement itself listed 13 signatories.
"No such thing as an unimportant match"
The federations said that for their countries, every World Cup match carries immense weight:
“For our countries, there is no such thing as an unimportant World Cup match.”
“To suggest that these matches are somehow less important is deeply disappointing and fails to recognise the efforts, sacrifices and aspirations of players, coaches, clubs, football leaders and supporters across the world.”
Football's universality stressed
The statement underscored that football does not belong to a select group of nations; its strength comes from its universality:
“Every nation that qualifies deserves respect. Every team has earned its place on merit. Every supporter has the right to dream. Every match carries meaning for millions of people around the world.”
A tournament in progress
The controversy broke as the 2026 World Cup, co-hosted by the United States, Mexico and Canada, was underway. Curacao made its debut on Sunday against Germany. The 48-team tournament features 104 matches and runs through 19 July, marking the first expansion since the 1998 finals moved from 24 to 32 teams. UEFA had not yet commented on Ceferin's remarks or the joint statement at the time of reporting.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- BBCWorld Cup 2026: Uefa boss criticised for 'uninteresting' comments
- NOSBoosheid na uitspraken UEFA-baas over 'totaal niet interessante' WK-duels
- The New York TimesWorld Cup nations reject UEFA president's criticism of 48-team expansion
- La RazónTrece selecciones mundialistas emiten un duro comunicado contra Ceferin
- Aleksander Ceferin
- UEFA president who characterised many 48-team World Cup matches as uninteresting
- Places
- Ljubljana
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar