Charles Bronson, one of Britain's most famous and longest-serving prisoners, has published a letter months ahead of his ninth career oral hearing before the Parole Board. The 73-year-old man accused the British prison system of 'lawlessly' extending his sentence and breaking legal principles. The case reignites debate about the purpose of long-term incarceration.

Allegation of unlawful detention

Bronson claims he has already served 23 years beyond his initial 'tariff' and is perpetually denied the possibility of progress and held in isolation.

Ninth attempt before the Parole Board

The upcoming oral hearing before the Parole Board is already Bronson's ninth attempt to obtain parole. The procedure gives him a chance for a direct presentation of his case.

Controversy over punishment and rehabilitation

Bronson's case has been the subject of public debate in the United Kingdom for decades concerning the limits of punishment, system effectiveness, and the sense of further isolating elderly prisoners.

Charles Bronson, born Michael Peterson, a legendary British prisoner, has made an emotional appeal to the public shortly before another crucial attempt to regain his freedom. In a letter provided to Sky News, the 73-year-old inmate sharply attacked the penal system, accusing it of 'lawlessly' extending his sentence and 'unlawful treatment'. He wrote: „I am 23 years over my tariff. I am forever denied progress. I am forever kept in solitary.” — Charles Bronson He added that prison authorities 'haven't even downgraded me from Category A', the highest risk category, which in his opinion prevents any progress in the rehabilitation process.

Charles Bronson's history dates back to 1974, when he was first imprisoned with a 7-year sentence for an armed robbery of a post office. His original tariff expired decades ago, but a series of subsequent sentences for brutal attacks on guards and taking hostages during prison riots turned him into an icon of prison resistance and a symbol of a man unsubdued by the system. The upcoming oral hearing before the Parole Board represents new hope for Bronson. This is already his ninth attempt to obtain parole; all previous eight ended in refusal. However, the oral procedure gives him a chance to present his case directly, testify on his own behalf, and submit evidence to the board members, which could mean a more thorough and fair analysis than the standard written application review. No specific date for the hearing has been given yet; it is scheduled to take place 'in the coming months'.

Bronson's case has sparked deep controversy for years and is the subject of lively debate in British society. On one hand, he is seen as a dangerous, unrehabilitated criminal who has repeatedly demonstrated extreme violence. On the other hand, his prolonged isolation, age, and claims of systemic injustice lead some of the public to question the purpose of further isolating a man whose original sentence expired long ago. His lawyers may argue that after decades behind bars, he poses minimal risk to society. Opponents of his release point to his history of violence and lack of signs of lasting change. The Parole Board's decision will have not only a personal dimension for Bronson but also a symbolic one for the discussion about the limits of punishment, rehabilitation, and justice within the legal system.

Mentioned People