Government · Washington
Supreme Court expands Trump's firing power over independent agencies but shields the Fed
The US Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a broad victory on presidential removal powers Monday, allowing him to fire FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, while separately blocking his attempt to oust Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook.
AI text based on reports by RTBF, 20minutes, Le Figaro.fr and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the president can fire FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, overturning a 1935 precedent that required cause for removing heads of independent agencies.
In a 5-4 decision, the Court blocked Trump from firing Fed governor Lisa Cook without a valid reason, preserving the central bank's independence.
Trump hailed the FTC ruling as a 'great victory' and 'one of the most important ever rendered concerning presidential powers,' while minimizing the Fed loss as procedural.
Lisa Cook welcomed the ruling, stating it reaffirms that the Fed must operate on data and independent judgment, free from political interference.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the majority's reasoning 'shaky' and predicted chaos; Chuck Schumer said the Court gave Trump 'carte blanche' to pack agencies with loyalists.
- 1 MarTrump fires FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter; a lower court blocks the dismissal.
- 29 JunSupreme Court rules 6-3 to allow Slaughter's firing, overturning 1935 precedent; in a separate 5-4 ruling, blocks Trump from firing Fed governor Lisa Cook.
Two decisions, one day
The Supreme Court issued a pair of rulings on June 29 that redraw the boundaries of executive authority over independent agencies. In a 6-3 vote, the conservative majority overturned a 1935 precedent that had shielded agency heads from at-will dismissal, clearing the way for President Trump to remove Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Slaughter. At the same time, a different 5-4 majority ruled that the president cannot fire a Federal Reserve governor without a valid reason, keeping Lisa Cook in her post.
The FTC case: a 90-year precedent falls
The case centered on Slaughter, a Democratic commissioner whom Trump dismissed shortly after returning to office in 2025. A lower court had blocked the firing, but the Supreme Court reversed that decision. Writing for six justices, the majority held that the president may remove "subordinates" who exercise executive functions, dismantling the 1935 barrier that required cause. Trump immediately celebrated on Truth Social, calling it a "great victory" and "one of the most important ever rendered concerning presidential powers."
“This is a historic and unprecedented decision.”
The three progressive justices dissented. Justice Sonia Sotomayor called the majority's reasoning "shaky" and warned it would lead to "chaos." Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said the Court had given Trump "carte blanche to turn independent federal agencies into private clubs reserved for his golf partners and cronies."
The Fed case: a shield for monetary independence
In a separate ruling, the Court refused to let Trump fire Fed governor Lisa Cook "at will." Five justices stressed that while the president can remove a monetary official for a "valid reason," he cannot do so "for any reason, or no reason at all." The case was widely seen as a test of the legal barriers protecting the central bank's independence from political pressure.
Trump had accused Cook of mortgage fraud, alleging she declared two different primary residences in a short period. Cook called it a good-faith error and immediately challenged the dismissal in court. She is the only Black woman on the Fed board, appointed by Joe Biden in 2022, with a term running to January 2038.
“The decision rendered today reaffirms a principle that has underpinned sound economic governance for generations: the Federal Reserve must make all its monetary policy decisions based on factual data and independent judgment, free from political interference.”
Trump downplayed the loss as "strictly procedural" and promised "appropriate action" to ensure "someone who has committed infractions cannot make crucial decisions."
Other rulings
The Court also rejected a Republican bid to limit mail-in voting and declined to hear Trump's appeal of a civil judgment that found him liable for sexual assault and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll. Those decisions, while overshadowed by the removal-power cases, added to a consequential day at the high court.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- RTBFLa Cour suprême autorise Donald Trump à limoger des responsables d'agences indépendantes, mais nuance pour la FED - RTBF Actus
- 20minutesLa Cour suprême empêche Trump de révoquer une responsable de la Fed
- Le Figaro.frÉtats-Unis : la Cour suprême bloque la tentative de Donald Trump de révoquer une gouverneure de la Fed
- France 24La Cour suprême donne à Trump de larges pouvoirs de révocation mais protège la Fed
- Donald Trump
- President of the United States who sought to fire FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and Fed governor Lisa Cook.
- Rebecca Slaughter
- Democratic commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission, fired by Trump in 2025.
- Lisa Cook
- Federal Reserve governor appointed by Joe Biden in 2022, whose firing by Trump was blocked by the Supreme Court.
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Supreme Court justice who dissented in the FTC case, calling the majority's reasoning 'shaky'.
- Chuck Schumer
- Senate Democratic leader who criticized the Court's FTC ruling as giving Trump 'carte blanche'.
- Jerome Powell
- Former Federal Reserve chair whom Trump previously tried to remove before the end of his term.
- Joe Biden
- Former US president who appointed Lisa Cook to the Fed in 2022.
- E. Jean Carroll
- Writer whose civil sexual assault and defamation judgment against Trump was not reviewed by the Supreme Court.
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar