Migration · Washington and Brooklyn
US Supreme Court allows Trump to end protected status for 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians
The ruling’s direct effect strips legal status from about 356,000 people, but advocates warn it may put nearly 1.3 million other TPS holders at risk.
AI text based on reports by Washington Post, The New York Times, Al Jazeera Online and other publishers. Changed . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
The conservative majority held that the 1990 statute blocks judicial review of the Homeland Security secretary’s decision to end TPS for Haiti and Syria.
About 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians now face potential detention and removal after living and working legally in the US, many for over a decade.
TPS holders from 17 other nations have filed lawsuits still pending; the Supreme Court ruling is expected to influence those cases.
In Brooklyn’s Caribbean enclave, community leaders fielded panicked calls, asking whether ICE agents would soon appear in their neighbourhoods.
The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Thursday that the Trump administration can terminate Temporary Protected Status for Haiti and Syria, exposing roughly 356,000 people who have lived and worked in the United States for years to potential detention and deportation. The justices split along ideological lines, with the conservative majority shielding the Homeland Security secretary’s decision from judicial review.
The decision
Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. The majority held that the 1990 Immigration Act prevents courts from reviewing a secretary’s final determination on TPS designations. Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented, arguing that procedural compliance remains reviewable.
Haiti was first designated for TPS after the 2010 earthquake that killed more than 250,000 people; Syria was added in 2012 following the outbreak of civil war. Both countries have repeatedly been found too dangerous for safe return by previous administrations. The Trump administration, however, moved to end both designations.
Communities react
In Brooklyn’s Little Haiti, the ruling turned excitement over Haiti’s World Cup appearance into anxiety. Yves Vilus, executive director of the Erasmus Neighborhood Federation, said his phone rang all morning.
“They know where we are. Will ICE be knocking?”
Immigration advocates said the court has become a rubber stamp for mass deportation. Elora Mukherjee of Columbia Law School called the administration’s system “a deportation machine” and described the court’s behaviour accordingly.
“In most cases, the Supreme Court has been a rubber stamp for Trump's mass deportation agenda.”
Wider consequences
Beyond the roughly 350,000 Haitians and 6,000 Syrians directly affected, the ruling is likely to influence dozens of pending lawsuits from TPS holders of 17 other nations. An estimated 1.3 million people currently hold TPS. They could face the loss of work permits and legal status if the administration applies the same reasoning.
- Haiti
- 350000 people
- Syria
- 6000 people
- Other 17 TPS countries (at risk)
- 1300000 people
Data from the article text
A pattern of rulings
Thursday’s decision was the third immigration ruling this week that favoured the administration’s enforcement-first agenda. Ahilan Arulanantham, a UCLA law professor and lawyer for the Syrian plaintiffs, said the pattern was clear.
“The Supreme Court has consistently ruled against the rights of immigrant communities in important cases in the last several years, and this case fits that pattern.”
Safety concerns
Humanitarian groups pointed out that US government travel warnings still advise against travel to Haiti due to violence, crime, terrorism and kidnapping. Tirana Hassan, CEO of Doctors Without Borders USA, said Haitians should not be returned.
“These are not conditions to which people should be returned.”
Former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who was fired months earlier, had declared the countries safe after what a Washington Post opinion column described as a perfunctory two-sentence consultation with the State Department. The court’s textualist reading, however, blocked any review of that process.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- Washington PostOpinion | The Supreme Court errs in this immigration ruling
- The New York TimesOn the Streets of New York's Little Haiti, Panic After Court Ruling
- Al Jazeera OnlineAdvocates warn of wide-ranging implications of US Supreme Court TPS ruling
- France 24Over a million immigrants risk deportation from US after landmark decision
- Samuel Alito
- US Supreme Court justice who wrote the majority opinion allowing the termination of TPS for Haiti and Syria
- Elena Kagan
- US Supreme Court justice who dissented from the TPS ruling
- Elora Mukherjee
- Director of the Immigrants' Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School
- Ahilan Arulanantham
- UCLA law professor and lawyer for the Syrian plaintiffs in the TPS dispute
- Tirana Hassan
- CEO of Doctors Without Borders USA
- Yves Vilus
- Executive director of the Erasmus Neighborhood Federation in Brooklyn
- Hector Sanchez Barba
- President of the Mi Familia Vota advocacy group
- Kristi Noem
- Former US Homeland Security Secretary who moved to end TPS for Haiti and Syria
- Donald Trump
- President of the United States whose administration sought to terminate TPS
- Places
- United States, Washington, D.C., Mexico
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar