Government · Madrid
Spanish Congress moves to fine deputies up to €2,000 and suspend them after Vox member climbed dais
The lower house approved initial consideration of a rule change that would penalise deputies who seriously breach order, prompted by a mid‑April confrontation between a Vox member and the vice‑president.
AI text based on reports by 20 minutos, europa press, El Periódico and other publishers. Published . How it is made
For membersThe first 30 seconds for everyone. Synthetic voice (AI).
In brief
Vox deputy José María Sánchez García was expelled on 14 April after climbing the dais and confronting Vice‑President Alfonso Rodríguez Gómez de Celis.
The reform would allow temporary suspension for violence or serious intimidation and impose fines of €1,000 to €2,000 for those expelled or refusing to leave.
The take‑into‑consideration passed with support from all groups except PP, Vox and UPN, launching committee negotiations.
The PP argued the president’s “abdication of duty” caused the deterioration of decorum, not a lack of rules.
Sánchez García defended his actions as lawful and accused the government of “democratic totalitarianism”.
Incident that sparked the reform
On 14 April the Vox deputy José María Sánchez García was expelled from the plenary session after twice climbing to the presidential dais. He first remonstrated with a legal officer, then confronted the first vice‑president, Alfonso Rodríguez Gómez de Celis, who was chairing the sitting. Sánchez García said he was protesting that an ERC deputy had called him a “criminal” and “murderer” without the chair granting him the floor to denounce it. His behaviour prompted the president of the chamber, Francina Armengol, to call for sanctions.
The proposed changes
The PSOE‑drafted reform introduces a new provision allowing the temporary suspension of any deputy who “by deed or word exercises, within the parliamentary premises, serious violence or intimidation against the Presidency or the Board … or against the body of legal officers or doorkeepers”. It also sets financial penalties: €1,000 for a deputy expelled after being called to order, rising to €2,000 if the deputy refuses the order to leave the chamber. The plenary would decide on suspension; fines would be automatic under certain circumstances.
“Democracy cannot remain impassive when certain behaviours seek to replace debate with intimidation, respect with harassment, the word with aggression.”
Political clash during the debate
The take‑into‑consideration vote on 11 June passed with the support of all parliamentary groups except the PP, Vox and UPN. PP speaker Marta González Vázquez accused the Socialist‑led majority of turning the chamber into “the Government’s delegation on Carrera de San Jerónimo”. She argued the existing disciplinary regime was sufficient and blamed the loss of presidential authority under Armengol for the deterioration of decorum: “With the previous 12 presidents it was never thought necessary to reform these rules because presidential authority acted as a deterrent. Today we see a worrying abdication of duty.”
Sánchez García himself took the floor for Vox, claiming that “there is no article that forbids deputies to approach or climb onto the dais” and that his purpose was “to talk, not to intimidate”. He called the move an expression of “democratic totalitarianism” and insisted he was the offended party. The deputy added that “the offended man was sanctioned”.
“Going up to the dais to speak is not an infraction. There is nothing that bans it.”
Warnings from allied parties
Several groups that back the government warned that the measures could set a dangerous precedent. Néstor Rego of the BNG called it “bad business to leave the work done for them” and cautioned that a PP‑Vox majority in the future might turn the new rules against minorities. ERC’s Pilar Vallugera asked for “great caution” in drafting the text and urged that sanctions be extended to the leadership of groups that systematically encourage such conduct. She noted that individual outbursts were often part of a party‑wide strategy.
“It’s a bad deal to hand them the finished work.”
The reform will now be negotiated in committee. The PSOE’s Rafaela Romero dismissed accusations of polarisation, arguing that one side is consistently responsible for harassment and doxing, while the other merely defends institutional rules.
Ask about this text
Sources and context
- 20 minutosEl Congreso tramitará la reforma para añadir causas de suspensión a diputados mientras PP y Vox cargan contra Armengol
- europa pressEl Congreso da el primer paso para multar con hasta 2.000 euros a...
- El PeriódicoEl Congreso estudiará sancionar con hasta 2.000 euros a los diputados que sean expulsados del pleno
- eldiario.esEl diputado de Vox que se encaró con el vicepresidente del Congreso: "No es ninguna infracción subir al estrado a hablar"
- Francina Armengol
- President of the Congress of Deputies who called for sanctions after the April incident
- José María Sánchez García
- Vox deputy expelled on 14 April for climbing the dais and confronting the vice‑president
- Alfonso Rodríguez Gómez de Celis
- First vice‑president of the Congress whom Sánchez García confronted during the 14 April session
- Rafaela Romero
- PSOE deputy who defended the reform as a proportional tool against intimidation
- Marta González Vázquez
- PP deputy who argued the current rules were sufficient and blamed Armengol’s inaction for the chamber’s decline in decorum
- Pilar Vallugera
- ERC deputy who urged caution in drafting and proposed sanctions for party leaderships that encourage misconduct
- Néstor Rego
- BNG deputy who warned the new rules could later be turned against minority groups
- Places
- Madrid
Pollar is free and carries no ads in the text. Its members keep it going.
Support Pollar