The commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East presented Donald Trump with options for action against Iran as diplomacy stalled and the U.S. strengthens its naval presence. Vice President J.D. Vance publicly argues that America will not get bogged down in a long war in the region. Simultaneously, Reuters reports that one of Trump's claims about Iranian missiles is not supported by U.S. intelligence findings.

Military Options for Trump

The commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East presented the president with options for action against Iran; some media link this to the deadlock in talks.

Vance Rules Out a Long War

Vice President J.D. Vance assures that the U.S. will not enter a multi-year conflict in the region, which is meant to limit fears about a ground operation.

Intelligence Questions Trump's Claim

Reuters reports that one of Trump's public statements about Iranian missiles is not supported by assessments from U.S. intelligence services.

Fleet Movements and New Capabilities

Media describe preparations by the US Navy; the movement of the aircraft carrier "USS Gerald R. Ford" was noted, as well as the readiness of a unit with kamikaze drones.

Congressional Dispute Over Powers

Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives want a vote to limit the president's war powers in case of actions against Iran.

The commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East presented Donald Trump with a set of action options regarding Iran – ranging from shows of force to strikes on selected targets – according to reports by Axios and media cited by Polish editorial offices. European articles (including L'Express and NZZ) emphasize that talks with Tehran have not yielded a breakthrough, and the space for diplomacy is rapidly shrinking. At the same time, signals of military preparations are emerging: some sources describe the readiness of U.S. naval forces, and Der Tagesspiegel notes the departure of the aircraft carrier "USS Gerald R. Ford" from the area near Crete. Bloomberg highlights the buildup of strike capabilities, pointing to the readiness of the Pentagon's first unit with kamikaze drones in case of operations against Iran. Since 1979, when the Islamic Revolution overthrew the Shah, U.S. relations with Iran have remained hostile, and disputes over influence in the Persian Gulf regularly lead to crises. From 2015 to 2018, the JCPOA nuclear agreement was a key point of reference, intended to limit Iran's nuclear program, but its future has become a subject of sharp disputes. The U.S. administration is simultaneously trying to control the narrative about escalation risk. Vice President J.D. Vance, in statements cited by American and German media, argued that Washington will not enter a multi-year conflict in the Middle East, which is meant to calm fears about a ground operation and prolonged occupation. „No chance the U.S. will be in a drawn-out war in the Middle East” — The political dispute in the U.S., however, is gaining significance: Axios describes actions by Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives, who want to force a vote on limiting the president's war powers. Reuters, in turn, reports that one of Trump's public claims about Iranian missiles has not been confirmed by U.S. intelligence services, which complicates the assessment of the premises for using force. In the background remain the conditions set for Tehran. Italian commentaries (Corriere della Sera) describe American demands including a complete halt to uranium enrichment and renunciation of ballistic missiles, which Iran is said to be rejecting. From the United Kingdom, meanwhile, comes a signal of support for dialogue channels: The Independent indicates that Prime Minister Keir Starmer declares support for diplomatic efforts, despite Washington's tough rhetoric.

Mentioned People

  • Donald Trump — President of the United States; received action options regarding Iran from the military command.
  • J.D. Vance — Vice President of the United States; publicly rules out a prolonged war in the Middle East.
  • Keir Starmer — Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; according to media, supports U.S.–Iran dialogue channels.
  • Jędrzej Szewko — Polish analyst on the Middle East cited in commentary material.