On March 13, 2026, the Polish Sejm elected six new judges to the Constitutional Tribunal, a move condemned by the opposition as 'lawlessness' and accompanied by warnings of a 'plan B' if President Karol Nawrocki refuses to swear them in.
Election of Six Judges
The Sejm voted to appoint six new members to the Constitutional Tribunal as part of ongoing judicial reforms.
Opposition Condemnation
PiS leader Jarosław Kaczyński described the election as 'lawlessness' and stated that the results would not be recognized.
Ministerial Warning
Minister of Justice Waldemar Żurek warned President Karol Nawrocki of a 'plan B' should he refuse to swear in the new judges.
Procedural Controversy
Reports suggest a rapporteur may have omitted a candidate during the voting process, potentially creating legal grounds for challenges.
The Sejm elected six new judges to the Constitutional Tribunal during a parliamentary session on March 13, 2026. This move was accompanied by the adoption of a resolution specifically targeting the current structure and functioning of the Constitutional Tribunal. While supporters of the change described the election as a necessary step to restore legal order, the opposition immediately challenged the validity of the process. The election of the six individuals is viewed by political analysts as the initial phase of a broader strategy regarding the tribunal's future composition. Reports indicate that the session was marked by intense debate over the legitimacy of the new appointments and the speed of the legislative process. The Constitutional Tribunal has been at the center of a protracted legal and political dispute in Poland for over a decade, beginning with contested appointments in late 2015. Since then, various governments have sought to influence its composition, leading to conflicting rulings and international scrutiny from European Union institutions. The current changes follow the 2025 presidential election, which altered the political landscape and the relationship between the executive and judicial branches.
Jarosław Kaczyński, the leader of the Law and Justice party, condemned the parliamentary proceedings as a violation of existing legal standards. He argued that the election of the new judges lacks a proper legal basis and will not be accepted by those who uphold the rule of law. According to reports from Niezalezna.pl, the voting process itself was technically flawed because the rapporteur allegedly omitted one of the candidates during the presentation. This procedural claim has been used by critics to suggest that the entire vote should be considered null and void. Jarosław Kaczyński also suggested that those responsible for the move would eventually face accountability for their actions. „No reasonable person will recognize this” — Jarosław Kaczyński via Dziennik
Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General Waldemar Żurek, who has held his position since 2025, issued a direct warning to the presidency regarding the upcoming swearing-in ceremony. Waldemar Żurek appealed to President Karol Nawrocki to fulfill his constitutional duty by accepting the oaths of the newly elected judges without delay. The Minister of Justice indicated that the government has prepared a "plan B" in the event that the president refuses to cooperate with the Sejm's decision. This alternative strategy remains undisclosed in detail but suggests a readiness to bypass potential presidential obstruction. The tension highlights the ongoing friction between the Ministry of Justice and the presidential palace. „bezprawie” (lawlessness) — Jarosław Kaczyński via polityka.se.pl
President Karol Nawrocki, who assumed office on August 6, 2025, now faces a critical decision that could determine the stability of the judicial system. As the head of state, his role in swearing in judges is traditionally seen as a formal requirement, yet previous precedents have shown this step can become a point of political contention. The election of six judges at once represents a substantial portion of the fifteen-member tribunal, potentially shifting its internal balance. Observers note that the outcome of this standoff will likely influence Poland's legal standing and its ongoing dialogue with international legal bodies. The government continues to assert that these appointments are essential for the effective operation of the state's highest court.