President Donald Trump has initiated a massive investigation into forced labor practices across 60 nations, including the EU, UK, and Canada, in a strategic move to circumvent Supreme Court restrictions on his tariff-imposing powers.

Global Investigation Launched

The U.S. administration is probing 60 countries for forced labor practices, targeting major economic partners like the UK, Canada, and the European Union.

Bypassing Judicial Limits

The move is seen as a legal maneuver to reintroduce trade barriers after a Supreme Court ruling limited the president's authority to impose broad tariffs.

Potential for New Tariffs

The findings of this human rights and labor standards investigation could provide the legal basis for new duties on a wide range of imported goods.

President Donald Trump's administration launched extensive investigations into forced labor practices across 60 different countries on March 13, 2026. The probe includes high-profile economic partners such as the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the Canadian government. This action represents the second major trade investigation of this nature initiated by the current administration. Federal authorities are tasked with examining whether goods imported from these regions are produced using coerced or involuntary labor. The scope of the investigation covers a vast array of industries and international markets. This move signals a significant escalation in the administration's use of labor standards as a tool for trade regulation.

The current initiative is widely characterized as a strategic maneuver to circumvent a recent Supreme Court ruling that limited the executive branch's power to unilaterally impose customs duties. By utilizing forced labor statutes, the administration seeks a legal alternative to reintroduce trade barriers that were previously curtailed by judicial oversight. The move has been described in media reports as a roundabout way to restart the imposition of tariffs. Legal analysts suggest that the administration is testing the limits of executive authority by linking trade restrictions to human rights and labor violations. This approach allows the government to bypass the specific legal hurdles established by the court's earlier decision. The United States has historically regulated imports through the Tariff Act of 1930, which contains provisions allowing for the seizure of goods produced by forced labor. While traditionally used for specific shipments, the law provides a framework for broader investigations into national labor practices. Previous administrations have utilized Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose tariffs based on national security grounds. The recent Supreme Court intervention has forced a shift toward alternative statutory justifications for trade protectionism.

The potential outcome of these investigations includes the implementation of new tariffs on a wide variety of products from the targeted nations. While the administration maintains that the goal is to combat forced labor and ensure fair competition for American workers, the move has raised concerns about renewed global trade tensions. The inclusion of traditional allies in the probe suggests that the administration is prepared to apply these measures broadly across the international community. If the investigations find evidence of systemic labor issues, the U.S. may move to restrict imports or apply punitive financial penalties. Market participants are currently assessing the risk of retaliatory actions from the European Union and other affected trade blocs. 60 (countries) — nations included in the forced labor probe Tariff Strategy Evolution: Primary Justification (before: Broad executive authority and national security, after: Forced labor and human rights investigations); Judicial Context (before: Unrestricted presidential power to set duties, after: Supreme Court limitations on unilateral tariff imposition)