On March 13, 2026, the Polish Sejm elected six new judges to the Constitutional Tribunal, a move defended by the government as a restoration of the rule of law but condemned by the opposition as an unconstitutional act of lawlessness.

Election of Six New Judges

The Sejm passed a resolution appointing Krystian Markiewicz, Maciej Taborowski, and Wojciech Dziurda among others to the Constitutional Tribunal.

Opposition Denounces Process

Jarosław Kaczyński and the PiS party labeled the election 'lawlessness,' claiming judges cannot be replaced via parliamentary resolutions.

Government's 'Plan B'

Minister of Justice Waldemar Żurek appealed to President Karol Nawrocki to swear in the judges, warning of a backup plan if the President refuses.

Procedural Controversy

The opposition alleged the voting process was flawed because the rapporteur reportedly omitted one of the candidates during the proceedings.

The Sejm elected six new judges to the Constitutional Tribunal on March 13, 2026, marking a significant shift in the composition of Poland's highest judicial body. The newly appointed judges include Krystian Markiewicz, Maciej Taborowski, and Wojciech Dziurda, all of whom were recommended by the Parliamentary Presidium. The election was conducted via a parliamentary resolution, a method that has sparked immediate legal and political controversy. This move is described by supporters as a necessary step to restore the functionality of the Constitutional Tribunal following years of systemic crisis. However, the opposition has challenged the legality of the process, arguing that appointments made through resolutions rather than statutory changes are invalid. The conflict over the Constitutional Tribunal began in late 2015 when the newly elected Law and Justice (PiS) government refused to recognize judges appointed by the previous parliament. Over the following decade, the tribunal became a focal point of a rule-of-law dispute between Poland and the European Union, leading to the freezing of billions in recovery funds. In 2024 and 2025, the governing coalition led by Donald Tusk initiated a series of reforms aimed at "resetting" the tribunal's composition. These efforts culminated in the 2026 appointments following the expiration of several terms of judges appointed during the PiS administration.

Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General Waldemar Żurek appealed to President Karol Nawrocki to immediately accept the oaths of the six newly elected judges. Waldemar Żurek emphasized that the legitimacy of the tribunal depends on the swift seating of these individuals to replace those whose terms have concluded. During a press conference, the minister indicated that the government has prepared alternative measures should the presidency obstruct the process. President Karol Nawrocki, who assumed office in August 2025, has not yet confirmed whether he will proceed with the swearing-in ceremony. The government's stance suggests a high-stakes standoff between the executive branch and the head of state. „Apeluję do prezydenta Karola Nawrockiego o odebranie ślubowania od nowo wybranych sędziów. W razie odmowy mamy przygotowany plan B, by zapewnić funkcjonowanie Trybunału” (I appeal to President Karol Nawrocki to take the oath from the newly elected judges. If there is a refusal, we have a plan B prepared to ensure the tribunal functions.) — Waldemar Żurek via Dziennik

The opposition, led by Jarosław Kaczyński, has condemned the election as a violation of the Polish Constitution and a threat to the democratic order. Jarosław Kaczyński described the proceedings as "lawlessness" and warned that those involved in the appointment process would face future criminal accountability. Critics of the vote also pointed to a specific procedural flaw involving the rapporteur, who allegedly omitted one of the candidates during the formal presentation before the vote. This omission has been cited by PiS lawmakers as a reason to consider the entire voting session legally defective. Despite these objections, the parliamentary majority proceeded with the confirmation of all six candidates. „Żaden rozsądny człowiek tego nie uzna. To jest bezprawie, a wobec osób odpowiedzialnych za ten uderzenie w Trybunał zostaną wyciągnięte konsekwencje karne” (No reasonable person will recognize this. This is lawlessness, and criminal consequences will be drawn against those responsible for this strike against the Tribunal.) — Jarosław Kaczyński via Se.pl

The financial implications of the new appointments were also highlighted, with reports detailing the substantial salaries and assets associated with the positions. Judges at the Constitutional Tribunal receive significant remuneration, which has become a point of public discussion amid the broader political struggle. The government maintains that the reform is essential to unblocking the judicial system and ensuring that the tribunal can once again serve as an independent arbiter of the law. As the situation develops, the focus remains on whether President Karol Nawrocki will comply with the Sejm's decision or trigger a deeper constitutional crisis by refusing the appointments. Constitutional Tribunal Election Process: — ; — ; —