The U.S. armed forces are developing plans for a large-scale military operation against Iran in case President Donald Trump makes the decision. According to reports from Reuters, a potential campaign could last many weeks and include attacks not only on nuclear infrastructure but also on key state facilities and targets related to Tehran's security. Experts warn of the risk of conflict escalation and retaliation from Iran.

Targets Beyond Nuclear Facilities

American plans include strikes on state facilities and security installations, going beyond previous targets related to Iran's nuclear program.

Preparations for a Long War

The Pentagon is preparing for a multi-week campaign, signaling a departure from the strategy of precise targeted strikes in favor of a full-scale conflict.

Risk of Tehran's Retaliation

Experts warn that Iran's retaliation could threaten U.S. forces stationed in the Middle East and destabilize the global economy.

The United States is preparing for a potential, prolonged conflict with Iran, which could significantly exceed the previous framework of rivalry between the two countries. According to information provided by two anonymous U.S. administration officials, the military is developing scenarios for an operation lasting several weeks. Unlike targeted strikes, this strategic plan envisions massive attacks on a wide range of targets. Beyond obvious points such as nuclear infrastructure, the target list includes government facilities and installations for internal and external security. Tensions between Washington and Tehran have persisted since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, when diplomatic relations were severed after Iranian students seized the U.S. embassy. The possibility of Donald Trump issuing an attack order puts the Middle East region at risk of destabilization. Defense specialists point out that such a broad campaign would expose U.S. military personnel in the region to direct danger of retaliation. Iranian asymmetric retaliation could target U.S. bases in Iraq, Syria, or Qatar, and also impact global energy security through a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The situation remains tense, and diplomacy seems to be taking a back seat to the concrete logistical preparations of the Pentagon. Both pro-American media and independent agencies emphasize that the scale of planned actions suggests an aim to permanently weaken Tehran's military potential, not just deterrence. It is unclear whether NATO allies have been included in the planning process for these operations, but the mobilization of forces indicates the determination of the current administration in Washington. In 2015, the JCPOA nuclear agreement was signed to limit Iran's nuclear ambitions in exchange for lifting sanctions, but the U.S. withdrew from it in 2018. „As part of a prolonged, multi-week campaign, the U.S. military could attack Iranian state and security facilities, not just nuclear infrastructure.” — Anonymous U.S. official several weeks — this is how long the potential U.S. operation could last

Highlights humanitarian risks and civilian casualties of the conflict, noting the danger of unilateral White House decisions without a UN mandate. | Emphasizes the necessity of a tough stance against the regime in Tehran and protecting U.S. national security interests and those of Israel.

Mentioned People

  • Donald Trump — President of the United States, whose decision would determine the start of a military operation against Iran.