Daniil Medvedev, the former ATP ranking leader, has proposed a radical reform of the tennis calendar that has sparked widespread discussion in the community. According to the Russian tennis player, only two tournaments – Grand Slam and ATP Finals – should award ranking points. All other events would be purely financial in nature. The proposal has received mixed reactions from other players and commentators.

Proposal to Limit Points

Medvedev advocates that ranking points for the ATP rankings should be awarded exclusively for results in the four Grand Slam tournaments and the ATP Finals. All other events, including ATP Masters 1000 and 500 series tournaments, would offer only prize money, without ranking points.

Goal: Reducing Player Burden

According to Medvedev, the main goal of the reform is to protect the physical and mental health of tennis players. Limiting the pressure associated with ranking points would allow players to better manage their calendar and avoid injuries caused by overload.

Mixed Reactions from the Community

The proposal has sparked mixed reactions. Some players, especially those struggling with injuries, see it as an opportunity for healthier and more sustainable sports practice. However, others fear that such a radical change would undermine the importance and prestige of the entire tennis cycle outside the Grand Slams.

Daniil Medvedev, a Russian tennis player and former world number one in the ATP rankings, has proposed a far-reaching reform of the tennis season structure. His concept assumes that ranking points would be awarded only for performances in the four Grand Slam tournaments and the prestigious ATP Finals. All other events, including key calendar tournaments like the Masters 1000 series and ATP 500, would become purely financial competitions, with no impact on a player's position in the world rankings. Medvedev argues that such a change would primarily serve the health and long-term careers of tennis players. The current, very tight calendar, full of high-ranking tournaments offering large point pools, forces players to constantly participate in events under pressure to maintain or improve their ranking. This leads to physical and mental overload and more frequent injuries. In his opinion, removing points from the calendar outside the Grand Slams would allow players to plan their season more selectively and recover better. In recent years, the debate about calendar overload in professional tennis has been growing louder. More and more top players, such as Rafael Nadal, Novak Djoković, and Andy Murray, have repeatedly signaled the problem of too many mandatory tournaments and their negative impact on health and career longevity. In response, the ATP has already introduced some modifications, such as shortening the season or changes to the ranking system, but Medvedev's proposal is one of the most radical postulates on this issue. The proposal has received mixed reactions. Some tennis players and commentators see it as a rational solution to the pressing problem of calendar overload. Others, including some tournament organizers and former players, express concerns that such a move would devalue the importance of the entire ATP Tour cycle, reducing the motivation of the best players to compete in tournaments outside the Grand Slams and ultimately weakening the sport globally. It is unclear whether and in what form Medvedev's idea could be implemented, as it would require agreement and deep restructuring from the tennis governing bodies – the ATP, WTA, and the federations responsible for the Grand Slam tournaments.

Mentioned People

  • Daniil Medwiediew — Russian tennis player, former ATP world number one, author of the controversial calendar reform proposal.