The South Korean tech giant has unveiled the latest Galaxy S26 smartphone line, introducing advanced artificial intelligence features and a new generation of audio accessories. Despite enthusiasm for the proactive Galaxy AI functions, the launch has elicited mixed feelings among experts. Reviewers point to the lack of magnets in the casing and minor design changes compared to predecessors, calling the new models 'reheated cutlets,' while simultaneously praising the new video stabilization and improved display technologies.
Expansion of Galaxy AI
The new proactive artificial intelligence system is designed to assist users in daily tasks and optimize device performance.
Design Controversies
The lack of magnets in the casing and strong resemblance to the S24 and S25 models are drawing criticism from reviewers and market analysts.
New Audio Accessories
Launch of the Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro earbuds with improved noise reduction and better integration with the Galaxy ecosystem.
Video and Battery Improvements
Introduction of new image stabilization technology and confirmation of work on new types of more efficient batteries.
The launch of the Galaxy S26 series is one of the most important moments in the 2026 tech calendar, yet this year's Samsung debut is characterized by exceptionally polarized reception. The manufacturer has bet on deep integration with the Galaxy AI system, which is intended to play the role of a proactive assistant, anticipating user needs. These innovations concern not only software but also hardware, as evidenced by reports of new battery types and improved displays that protect privacy from onlookers. Galaxy AI is set to become the foundation of the ecosystem, connecting smartphones with the new Galaxy Buds 4 and Buds 4 Pro earbuds, which emphasize sound quality and noise reduction. Despite technological progress, industry media are criticizing the company's design decisions. The biggest controversy is the lack of built-in magnets (a system similar to MagSafe), which Samsung explains as a focus on other device parameters, but for many users, this is a step backward. Criticism also concerns the slow evolution of design; comparisons of the S26, S25, and S24 models suggest that visual changes are marginal. Some commentators even suggest that upcoming innovations in the foldable device segment may soon render the classic S series obsolete. Meanwhile, telecom operators such as AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile have begun an aggressive battle for customers, offering the flagships at extremely low prices with long-term contracts. The Galaxy S series, launched in 2010, has for years set standards for Android devices, directly competing with Apple's iPhones for the title of the world's most advanced smartphone.On the hardware side, it's worth noting the new video stabilization, which is set to define new standards in mobile cinematography. Simultaneously, Samsung is preparing the market for future innovations, including reinforced screens for foldable models and a new generation of the S Pen stylus, which may debut alongside the S27 series or Z Fold 8. For less demanding customers, announcements have been made for mid-range models from the Galaxy A series, which are set to receive larger batteries. Currently, the market is focused on pre-order offers, where discounts reach up to 255 euros, aiming to stimulate demand in the face of global smartphone market saturation. „Samsung lancia i nuovi Galaxy S26, la nuova Galaxy AI promette un'assistenza proattiva all'utente” (Samsung launches the new Galaxy S26, the new Galaxy AI promises proactive user assistance) — Il Fatto Quotidiano In summary, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a safe device but raises questions about the future direction of innovation. While artificial intelligence becomes the main selling point, shortcomings in physical functionality (such as the mentioned magnets) may discourage some loyal users from upgrading to the new model.
Perspektywy mediów: Liberal and tech media focus on AI innovations and the earbud ecosystem, praising the proactive assistant features. Critics and traditional reviewers emphasize the lack of physical innovations, absence of magnets, and the derivative design compared to older models.