The upcoming referendum on judicial reform in Italy is causing deep divisions within the legal community. The main point of contention is the separation of the careers of judges and prosecutors. While some lawyers are loudly advocating for changes, others are calling for the preservation of political neutrality. Tensions are also rising between the National Bar Council and judges' associations, further intensifying the public debate ahead of the upcoming vote.

Dispute Over CNF Neutrality

President Francesco Greco is criticized by 80 lawyers for officially supporting the referendum, which violates the apolitical nature of the National Bar Council.

Voice of Investigative Judges

Gherardo Colombo, known from the Mani Pulite trial, warns of a potential weakening of civil rights protection as a result of the proposed changes.

Different Stances of Regional Councils

The council in Turin declared neutrality, while lawyers in Trieste and Milan are actively promoting a "yes" vote.

Italy is preparing for a referendum that could fundamentally change its justice system. The central point of the reform, promoted by Carlo Nordio, is the separation of the careers of judges and prosecutors. Currently, both groups form a single corporation, which, according to supporters of the changes, violates the principle of impartiality. Francesco Greco, President of the National Bar Council (CNF), has become the face of the movement for change, accusing judges' associations of behaving like political parties. However, his stance has met with resistance within his own professional group – 80 lawyers have sent a protest letter, accusing him of violating the institution's apolitical nature. The Italian legal system has been in a state of permanent tension between the executive and judicial branches since the 1990s and the "Clean Hands" (Mani Pulite) operation. The Nordio reform is an attempt to finally separate prosecutorial functions from judicial ones. The debate has moved to the country's largest cities. In Trieste, legal circles have organized meetings under the slogan "Lawyers for Yes", arguing that the reform is necessary to level the playing field in criminal proceedings. Meanwhile, in Turin, the local district bar council has decided to maintain complete neutrality, believing that a self-governing institution should not impose a worldview on its members. Gherardo Colombo, a legendary former investigative judge, has also spoken out, warning that the changes could lead to a weakening of civil rights and undermine the independence of the prosecution from government influence. „Claiming that among those voting "yes" are mafiosi means conducting a campaign of hatred. This is an unacceptable generalization.” — Francesco Greco The atmosphere is further heated by accusations of politicization of the reform process itself. Critics argue that the changes are being imposed by the government without proper dialogue with parliament. At the same time, ANM (National Association of Magistrates) is being attacked for conducting an election campaign in court buildings. Amid these disputes, the "Lawyers for No" committee, which already includes over 900 lawyers, is demanding strict adherence to the principle of equal treatment in the media and during official events organized by bar associations. Committee Lawyers for No: 900, Lawyers signatories of letter against Greco: 80 900 — lawyers have joined the committee opposing the reform Key Changes in the Judicial Reform: : → ; : →

Mentioned People

  • Francesco Greco — President of the National Bar Council (CNF), actively promoting a yes vote in the referendum.
  • Gherardo Colombo — Former investigative judge, known for fighting corruption, opponent of the reform.
  • Carlo Nordio — Italian Minister of Justice, initiator of the judicial reform.