An unprecedented trial has begun in Los Angeles against tech giants accused of deliberately designing algorithms that addict minors. The plaintiff, identified by the initials KGM, claims that years of using platforms like Instagram and YouTube ruined her childhood and caused severe anxiety disorders. While TikTok and Snapchat have reached settlements, Meta and Google have chosen to face the court battle, which could determine the future of the industry.
Historic trial on addiction
A jury in Los Angeles is deciding whether platforms deliberately use addictive mechanisms on children, marking the first such case in the US.
Settlements and confrontations
TikTok and Snapchat reached settlements, while Meta and Google are fighting in court, rejecting allegations of destroying users' mental health.
Testimony of Mark Zuckerberg
The head of Meta is set to testify regarding accusations of causing depression and anxiety disorders in the young plaintiff.
A first-of-its-kind civil trial is underway in Los Angeles, where a jury will assess corporate responsibility for the mental health of the younger generation. The plaintiff, now a 20-year-old woman, began using YouTube at just 6 years old and soon after created an Instagram account, violating age limits. Her lawyers argue the platforms were mechanically and psychologically designed to maximize screen time, leading their client to develop anxiety disorders and body dysmorphia. This modern legal battle resembles the major lawsuits against tobacco companies in the 1990s, which ended with payouts of hundreds of billions of dollars after proving manufacturers concealed knowledge about nicotine's harm. The trial situation is dynamic. Just before proceedings began, Snap Inc. (owner of Snapchat) and ByteDance (owner of TikTok) opted for confidential settlements with the plaintiff, avoiding public litigation. Meanwhile, Meta and Google consistently reject the allegations. Adam Mosseri, head of Instagram, admits social media can generate some health issues but firmly denies they are designed as addictive products. A key moment in the trial will be the testimony of Mark Zuckerberg, who will be questioned about internal moderation mechanisms and the impact of algorithms on children's psyches. 6 years — was the plaintiff's age when she began regularly using YouTube Experts indicate the outcome of this case could trigger an avalanche of similar lawsuits, currently consolidated under multi-district litigation in California. If the court finds the giants guilty, the tech industry may face the necessity of fundamentally changing its business model, which is based on user engagement. Body dysmorphia and depression among youth are becoming central points of the accusation, forcing courts to decide whether algorithms are protected by free speech or are defective products. US law has for decades protected online platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields them from liability for user-published content, but current lawsuits focus on the very architecture of the systems. „I rule out that Instagram creates addiction, although I acknowledge it may cause some health problems.” — Adam Mosseri Liberal media emphasize the systemic failure of large corporations in protecting children and the need for strict algorithm regulations. | Conservative commentary more often points to the role of parents and the economic freedom of tech companies from state interference.
Mentioned People
- Mark Zuckerberg — CEO of Meta, who is set to testify in the trial concerning the harmfulness of social media.
- Adam Mosseri — Head of Instagram, who denied allegations that the app is deliberately designed to cause addiction.